Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #44,543 of 84,120 nationally
Rural Hall Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 37067002807 · Forsyth County, NC · pop 5,397 · 27% of tract blocks fall in Rural Hall
Rural Hall is where census tract 37067002807 sits, home to 5,397 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 5.2/10. That is riskier than about 45% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 17% of renter households, a modest level, and 8% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $982 a month while the average household earns $71,560 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 13% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%
Stable renters 11%
Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units2,275
Renter share12.6%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate12.1%
Median income$71,560
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
52
th percentile
Moderate
National
47
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rural Hall and the region
Centroid at 36.2377, -80.2778 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rural Hall scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Rural Hall
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
12.1% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$982 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rural Hall
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rural Hall
6.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rural Hall
6.3
How Rural Hall compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 41
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 48%Socioeconomic
- 62%Household composition
- 52%Racial/ethnic minority
- 18%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 310Total filings over 4 yrs
- 24.84%Avg annual filing rate
- 40.1%Peak (2005)
- 54Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 51% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.7%Housing insecurity
- 7.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 14.0%Food insecurity
- 11.2%SNAP enrollment
- 7.8%Transit barriers
- 9.9%No health insurance
- 16.1%Frequent mental distress
- 33.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Rural Hall
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 6.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rural Hall, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Forsyth County average of 5.5 and in line with the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 310 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 24.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 40.1% of renter households in 2005.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 41st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 37067002807
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37067002807?
Census tract 37067002807 in Rural Hall scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 37067002807?
Median gross rent is $982/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 17% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 37067002807?
12.1% of residents in tract 37067002807 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,397.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 37067002807?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 62th, minority 52th, housing 18th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37067002807?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 310 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 37067002807 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 24.84% of renter households, peaking at 40.1% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 37067002807 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 37067002807 compare to Rural Hall overall?
Tract 37067002807 scores 3.8/10, higher than the parent city of Rural Hall at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rural Hall; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Rural Hall
Top eight tracts in Rural Hall ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related