Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #61,558 of 84,120 nationally

Walkertown Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 37067003003 · Forsyth County, NC · pop 4,022 · 36% of tract blocks fall in Walkertown

With a score of 3.3/10, tract 37067003003 in Walkertown, NC reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,022 residents. 24% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Forsyth County average of 41.1%.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 9% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,299
Renter share11.4%
SVI overall0.62
Poverty rate14.6%
Median income$87,835

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 6 tracts In Walkertown
Elevated
Within county
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#54 of 95 tracts In Forsyth County
Moderate
Within state
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#1,695 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Low
National
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#61,558 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Walkertown and the region

Centroid at 36.1328, -80.1526 · click any tract to drill in

Why Walkertown scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Walkertown
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
14.6% poverty · this tract
3.7
Supply constraint
$1,021 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Walkertown
4.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Walkertown
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Walkertown
4.2

How Walkertown compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Walkertown risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.3This tracttract 0030033.6Walkertownparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 62

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 75Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 7.09%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.4%Peak (2012)
  • 23Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2005 to 2012
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 37067003003
Filings climbed 109% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Walkertown

The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.5/10. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.9/10.

At $1,021 a month, rents run 26% under what the rest of Walkertown commands. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.3/10.

The filing record is not thin: 75 evictions over 4 years of observation. Against the Forsyth County average of 3.9, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.6 points. Filings peaked in 2012 at 8.4% of renter households.

In a typical year about 7.1% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 27th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

At 11% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 6.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 14% of average household income of $87,835, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 37067003003

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37067003003?

Census tract 37067003003 in Walkertown scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37067003003?

Median gross rent is $1,021/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 24% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37067003003?

14.6% of residents in tract 37067003003 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,022.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37067003003?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 62th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 75th, minority 50th, housing 46th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37067003003?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 75 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 37067003003 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.09% of renter households, peaking at 8.4% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 37067003003 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 37067003003 compare to Walkertown overall?

Tract 37067003003 scores 3.3/10, lower than the parent city of Walkertown at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Walkertown; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Walkertown

Top eight tracts in Walkertown ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related