Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Etowah Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 37089931901 · Henderson County, NC · pop 3,605 · 58% of tract blocks fall in Etowah

With a score of 3/10, tract 37089931901 in Etowah, NC reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,605. Cost burden runs 18% here against 38.4% across Henderson County.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 11% Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units1,620
Renter share13.6%
SVI overall0.14
Poverty rate9.6%
Median income$92,713

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Etowah
Very Low
Within county
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#24 of 30 tracts In Henderson County
Low
Within state
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#1,927 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Low
National
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Etowah and the region

Centroid at 35.2952, -82.5690 · click any tract to drill in

Why Etowah scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Etowah
4.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.1
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
9.6% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$930 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Etowah
6.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Etowah
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Etowah
6.2

How Etowah compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Etowah risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 9319013.4Etowahparent city4.0Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 14

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 95Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 5.01%Avg annual filing rate
  • 15.7%Peak (2005)
  • 7Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 37089931901
Filings climbed 40% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Etowah

Pulling hardest the other way is supply constraint at 1.2/10. Average gross rent is $930, 34% below the Etowah average. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.1/10.

Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.3/10. It sits 1.0 points below the Henderson County average of 4.0.

Housing insecurity runs 5.7% against 14.2% nationally. The filing record is not thin: 95 evictions over 15 years of observation. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.7% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

The worst year on record was 2005, when 15.7% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 5.0% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.3/10. Rent consumes only 12% of average household income of $92,713, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 37089931901

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37089931901?

Census tract 37089931901 in Etowah scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37089931901?

Median gross rent is $930/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 18% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37089931901?

9.6% of residents in tract 37089931901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,605.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37089931901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 14th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 29th, household 38th, minority 14th, housing 8th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37089931901?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 95 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 37089931901 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.01% of renter households, peaking at 15.7% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 37089931901 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 37089931901 compare to Etowah overall?

Tract 37089931901 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Etowah at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Etowah; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Etowah

Top eight tracts in Etowah ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related