Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally

Rosedale Eviction Risk: Lower , Huntersville

Tract 37119006212 · Mecklenburg County, NC · pop 4,427 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Tract 37119006212, home to 4,427 residents in the Rosedale area of Huntersville, scores 5.7/10 for landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 64th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

44% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,740 a month while the average household earns $98,333 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. Renters make up 47% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 27% Owners 52%
Tract context
Occupied units1,860
Renter share47.4%
SVI overall0.27
Poverty rate3.8%
Median income$98,333

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Rosedale
Moderate
Within parent city
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 15 tracts In Huntersville
High
Within county
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#277 of 305 tracts In Mecklenburg County
Very Low
Within state
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#2,443 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Huntersville and the region

Centroid at 35.4142, -80.8681 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rosedale scores 1.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Huntersville
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.8
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
3.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,740 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Huntersville
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Huntersville
6.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Huntersville
3.5

How Rosedale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rosedale risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.91.9This tracttract 006212Huntersville: 2.52.5Huntersvilleparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 27

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 243Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 11.64%Avg annual filing rate
  • 21.7%Peak (2005)
  • 43Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2005 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 371190062122005: 94 filings (21.73/100 renter HHs)2014: 60 filings (10.85/100 renter HHs)2015: 46 filings (8.32/100 renter HHs)2016: 43 filings (5.67/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 54% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rosedale

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 6.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Huntersville eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Mecklenburg County average of 5.5 and above the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 27th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 37119006212

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37119006212?

Census tract 37119006212 in the Rosedale neighborhood scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37119006212?

Median gross rent is $1,740/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37119006212?

3.8% of residents in tract 37119006212 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,427.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37119006212?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 27th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 22th, household 41th, minority 56th, housing 30th.
Q5

Is tract 37119006212 considered part of Rosedale?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37119006212 fall within Rosedale (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37119006212?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 243 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 37119006212 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.64% of renter households, peaking at 21.7% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 37119006212 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 37119006212 compare to Huntersville overall?

Tract 37119006212 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Huntersville at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Huntersville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Huntersville

Top eight tracts in Huntersville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related