Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #15,522 of 84,120 nationally

Five Points Eviction Risk: Moderate , Rocky Mount

Tract 37127010400 · Nash County, NC · pop 3,487 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Here is how census tract 37127010400, in the Five Points area of Rocky Mount eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 6.2/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 3,487. That is riskier than roughly 80% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 49% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $832 a month against an average household income of $40,833 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. Renters make up 75% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 36% Stable renters 38% Owners 26%
Tract context
Occupied units1,312
Renter share74.7%
SVI overall0.91
Poverty rate45.7%
Median income$40,833

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Five Points
Moderate
Within parent city
81 th percentile
Rank, 81st percentileLowHigh
#4 of 17 tracts In Rocky Mount
High
Within county
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 25 tracts In Nash County
Very High
Within state
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#184 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rocky Mount and the region

Centroid at 35.9497, -77.8048 · click any tract to drill in

Why Five Points scores 5.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rocky Mount
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
45.7% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$832 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rocky Mount
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rocky Mount
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rocky Mount
3.5

How Five Points compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Five Points risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.75.7This tracttract 010400Rocky Mount: 3.13.1Rocky Mountparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 91

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,185Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 113.20%Avg annual filing rate
  • 118.4%Peak (2002)
  • 1,042Filings in 2003 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Five Points

The score leans hardest on economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rocky Mount eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Nash County average of 5.3 and above the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 2,185 eviction filings here over 2 tracked years, with about 113.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 118.4% of renter households in 2002.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 91st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 37127010400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37127010400?

Census tract 37127010400 in the Five Points neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37127010400?

Median gross rent is $832/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37127010400?

45.7% of residents in tract 37127010400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,487.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37127010400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 91th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 57th, minority 86th, housing 80th.
Q5

Is tract 37127010400 considered part of Five Points?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37127010400 fall within Five Points (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37127010400?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,185 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 37127010400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 113.20% of renter households, peaking at 118.4% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 37127010400 struggle to pay rent?

About 27.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 21.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 37127010400 compare to Rocky Mount overall?

Tract 37127010400 scores 5.7/10, higher than the parent city of Rocky Mount at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rocky Mount eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rocky Mount

Top eight tracts in Rocky Mount ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related