Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #11,988 of 84,120 nationally

Lincoln Park Eviction Risk: Elevated , Greenville

Tract 37147000701 · Pitt County, NC · pop 3,088 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

With a score of 7.2/10, tract 37147000701 in the Lincoln Park area of Greenville, NC reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,088. The dominant input is economic stress at 10/10.

Risk score
7.2
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 35% Stable renters 52% Owners 13%
Tract context
Occupied units1,612
Renter share86.4%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate40.3%
Median income$32,330

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Lincoln Park
Moderate
Within parent city
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 28 tracts In Greenville
Elevated
Within county
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 42 tracts In Pitt County
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Greenville and the region

Centroid at 35.6101, -77.3927 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lincoln Park scores 7.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Greenville
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
40.3% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$975 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Greenville
6.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Greenville
9.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Greenville
7.5

How Lincoln Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lincoln Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.2This tracttract 0007015.8Greenvilleparent city5.4Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 93

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 3,491Total filings over 14 yrs
  • 18.44%Avg annual filing rate
  • 27.3%Peak (2005)
  • 248Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2005 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 37147000701
Filings dropped 35% over the past 14 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lincoln Park

SNAP participation runs 41.2% against 15.2% nationally. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 9.8/10. The poverty rate is 40%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

86% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. 26% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 9.4/10. Set annual rent against average income of $32,330 and the ratio lands at 36%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Against the Pitt County average of 5.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.8 points.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 23.2% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Court records carry 3,491 eviction filings across 14 observed years.

Filings peaked in 2005 at 27.3% of renter households. In a typical year about 18.4% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #11,988 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.4/10. Statewide the NC average is 4.0, so this tract runs 3.2 points hotter.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 37147000701

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37147000701?

Census tract 37147000701 in the Lincoln Park neighborhood scores 7.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37147000701?

Median gross rent is $975/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37147000701?

40.3% of residents in tract 37147000701 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,088.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37147000701?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 87th, minority 82th, housing 82th.
Q5

Is tract 37147000701 considered part of Lincoln Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37147000701 fall within Lincoln Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37147000701?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 3,491 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 37147000701 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 18.44% of renter households, peaking at 27.3% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 37147000701 struggle to pay rent?

About 28.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 23.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 37147000701 compare to Greenville overall?

Tract 37147000701 scores 7.2/10, higher than the parent city of Greenville at 5.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Greenville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Greenville

Top eight tracts in Greenville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related