Foster County, North Dakota Eviction Risk: Very Low
5 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Carrington (2.1) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.
Ranked #41 of 53 ND counties
2k residents · 5 cities · 1 tracts
Foster County eviction risk score history
Key metrics
-
Tenant beats landlord12.5%/ 100 outcomesIn court-decided eviction outcomes for Foster County, ND, tenants prevail in roughly 12.5% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses and longer calendars.
-
Timeline20dfiling → judgmentFrom the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Foster County, ND until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 20 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent for landlords.
-
Cost range$0.9–2.4klegal + lost rentA typical eviction in Foster County, ND costs landlords $863 to $2,387 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent.
-
Average rent$77828% stretched on rentAverage gross rent in Foster County, ND is $778 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey. 28% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent.
-
Renters27.8%of households27.8% of occupied housing units in Foster County, ND are renter-occupied. A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings and a more active rental market.
-
Poverty11.0%0.1% unemp.11.0% of Foster County, ND residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 0.1%. Both feed the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model.
Scrub 50 years
Foster County scores 1.7/10 (Very Low), ranging from 1.6 in its lowest-risk communities to 2.1 in Grace City. The county sits in the lower-risk of North Dakota. Ranked 41st of 53 North Dakota counties, with 40 counties carrying higher eviction risk scores.
How Foster County ranks in North Dakota
Landlord guides for North Dakota
| City↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | % income on rent↕ | Average rent↕ | Lean↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Carrington | 2,168 | 1.7 | 28.2% | $778 | Rep |
| 002 | McHenry | 66 | 1.9 | 28.2% | $778 | Rep |
| 003 | Glenfield | 63 | 1.6 | 28.2% | $778 | Rep |
| 004 | Grace City | 61 | 2.1 | 28.2% | $778 | Rep |
| 005 | Courtenay | 29 | 1.6 | 28.2% | $778 | Rep |
County heatmap
One county, multiple regulatory regimes.
Foster County sits in the heart of central North Dakota, home to roughly 2,387 residents spread across Carrington and four smaller communities. The county carries an eviction risk score of 1.7/10 (Very Low), placing it 41st out of 53 North Dakota counties -- well into the lower-risk of the state. Forty counties statewide register higher risk scores, while 12 come in lower, which means landlords operating in Foster County face one of the more predictable, lower-friction regulatory environments in North Dakota.
Carrington, the county seat and by far its largest community at 2,168 residents, anchors the county with a score of 1.7/10. The smaller villages show modest variation: Grace City 2.1/10 is the highest-scoring community in the county, while Glenfield 1.6/10 and Courtenay 1.6/10 sit at the low end of the county range. McHenry 1.9/10 falls between those poles. Across all five communities, scores range from 1.6 to 2.1 -- a relatively tight band reflecting the county's uniformly landlord-favorable statutory environment rather than significant local policy variation. The statewide average of 1.8/10 gives useful context: Foster County lands at or below that figure depending on the community, consistent with its lower-risk profile.
Several structural features of North Dakota landlord-tenant law drive the county's favorable reading. The state operates under N.D.C.C. § 47-16 (Leasing of Real Property) with no just-cause eviction requirement and no local rent control -- North Dakota preempts municipalities from enacting rent regulations entirely. Landlords must give only 3 days' notice for nonpayment of rent or lease violations, and 30 days for no-cause terminations. Court filing fees run $75 to $150, and uncontested matters typically resolve in 21 to 40 days; contested cases stretch to 45 to 100 days, still relatively compact compared with high-cost metros elsewhere in the country. At an average rent of $778 per month and a rent burden of 28.2% -- meaning the average renter household spends just over a quarter of income on housing -- the financial pressure on tenants is moderate but not extreme. Renter households account for about 27.8% of occupied units, and 11% of the population lives below the poverty line, both figures consistent with a small, agriculture-oriented rural county.
Foster County's 1.7/10 score reflects a statutory framework built around landlord flexibility: no rent caps, no just-cause requirement, a 3-day cure period for nonpayment, and court costs that keep eviction proceedings accessible. The county's low population and predominantly owner-occupied housing stock mean that rental market dynamics stay relatively stable year to year, with limited tenant-advocacy infrastructure to shift the regulatory balance.
Eviction filings in Foster County
In October 2024, 1 eviction filings were recorded in Foster County, 100.0% of the historical average (near average).1
- 1Oct 2024
- 100.0%of historical avg
- 342Renter households
- 9.1%Poverty rate
Historical eviction filings in Foster County
From 2000 to 2016, eviction filings in Foster County increased. The peak was 2 filings in 2012.2
- 02000
- 2Peak (2012)
- 12016
Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.
How Foster County compares
Foster County's 1.7/10 (Very Low) places it below the North Dakota eviction laws statewide average of 1.8/10, confirming its position as one of the state's more landlord-favorable markets. Its closest peer counties -- Cavalier, Sargent, LaMoure, Bowman, and Bottineau -- all cluster in a similarly low-risk band, reflecting the broadly uniform regulatory environment across rural North Dakota. None of those peers carry materially stronger or weaker tenant protections; the modest differences among them trace primarily to rent burden and poverty indicators rather than statutory divergence.