Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #39,308 of 84,120 nationally

Fairfield Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 39017010901 · Butler County, OH · pop 4,428

With a score of 4.6/10, tract 39017010901 in Fairfield, OH reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,428. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 8.8/10.

Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 20% Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units2,149
Renter share34.2%
SVI overall0.64
Poverty rate11.0%
Median income$63,705

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 11 tracts In Fairfield
Elevated
Within county
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#37 of 86 tracts In Butler County
Elevated
Within state
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#1,142 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Elevated
National
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#39,308 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fairfield and the region

Centroid at 39.3499, -84.5782 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fairfield scores 4.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fairfield
4.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
11.0% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,149 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fairfield
5.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fairfield
7.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fairfield
5.3

How Fairfield compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fairfield risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.6This tracttract 0109014.0Fairfieldparent city4.3Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 64

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 696Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 10.59%Avg annual filing rate
  • 34.2%Peak (2009)
  • 20Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2006 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 39017010901
Filings dropped 59% over the past 13 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fairfield

Severe burden reaches 22%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.9/10.

On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.4/10. The filing record is not thin: 696 evictions over 13 years of observation.

The worst year on record was 2009, when 34.2% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

In a typical year about 10.6% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #39,308 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. 41% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

It tracks the Butler County average of 4.3 closely.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 39017010901

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39017010901?

Census tract 39017010901 in Fairfield scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39017010901?

Median gross rent is $1,149/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39017010901?

11.0% of residents in tract 39017010901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,428.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39017010901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 42th, household 59th, minority 40th, housing 88th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39017010901?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 696 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 39017010901 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 10.59% of renter households, peaking at 34.2% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 39017010901 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 39017010901 compare to Fairfield overall?

Tract 39017010901 scores 4.6/10, higher than the parent city of Fairfield at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fairfield eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 39017010901 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fairfield

Top eight tracts in Fairfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related