Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally

Diamond Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , East Liverpool

Tract 39029952100 · Columbiana County, OH · pop 1,193 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 39029952100 covers part of the Diamond Historic District area of East Liverpool, OH, and scores 5.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,193. SNAP participation runs 38.0% against 15.2% nationally.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32% Stable renters 41% Owners 27%
Tract context
Occupied units555
Renter share73.2%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate37.4%
Median income$26,250

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Diamond Historic District
Moderate
Within parent city
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 6 tracts In East Liverpool
High
Within county
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 25 tracts In Columbiana County
High
Within state
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#554 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across East Liverpool and the region

Centroid at 40.6180, -80.5841 · click any tract to drill in

Why Diamond Historic District scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from East Liverpool
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
37.4% poverty · this tract
9.3
Supply constraint
$746 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from East Liverpool
5.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from East Liverpool
8.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from East Liverpool
7.1

How Diamond Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Diamond Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.4This tracttract 9521004.0East Liverpoolparent city4.0Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 159Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 3.39%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.2%Peak (2007)
  • 18Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 39029952100
Filings climbed 38% over the past 10 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Diamond Historic District

What pushes it up most is economic stress at 9.3/10. The poverty rate is 37%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

The severe-burden share is 24%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Set annual rent against average income of $26,250 and the ratio lands at 34%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.6/10. 73% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

Cost burden runs 43% here against 34.5% across Columbiana County. Disability prevalence runs 45.5% against 31.5% nationally.

Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.9/10. It sits 1.4 points above the Columbiana County average of 4.0.

Court records carry 159 eviction filings across 10 observed years. Filings peaked in 2007 at 4.2% of renter households.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 39029952100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39029952100?

Census tract 39029952100 in the Diamond Historic District neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39029952100?

Median gross rent is $746/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39029952100?

37.4% of residents in tract 39029952100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,193.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39029952100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 89th, minority 26th, housing 50th.
Q5

Is tract 39029952100 considered part of Diamond Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39029952100 fall within Diamond Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39029952100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 159 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 39029952100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.39% of renter households, peaking at 4.2% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 39029952100 struggle to pay rent?

About 22.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 19.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 39029952100 compare to East Liverpool overall?

Tract 39029952100 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of East Liverpool at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from East Liverpool; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in East Liverpool

Top eight tracts in East Liverpool ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related