Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally
Fairmount Boulevard Historic District Eviction Risk: Lower , Cleveland Heights
Tract 39035141400 · Cuyahoga County, OH · pop 2,520 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Census tract 39035141400 covers part of the Fairmount Boulevard Historic District area of Cleveland Heights, OH, and scores 3.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,520. Cost burden runs 81% here against 43.0% across Cuyahoga County.
Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%
Stable renters 1%
Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units1,009
Renter share7.1%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate2.4%
Median income$163,512
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
5
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
29
th percentile
Low
Within state
35
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cleveland Heights and the region
Centroid at 41.4966, -81.5786 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fairmount Boulevard Historic District scores 3.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cleveland Heights
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
2.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,239 rent vs county FMR
5.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cleveland Heights
5.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cleveland Heights
8.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cleveland Heights
6.3
How Fairmount Boulevard Historic District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 4
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 8%Socioeconomic
- 12%Household composition
- 30%Racial/ethnic minority
- 8%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 99%Grade B
- 1%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 48Total filings over 12 yrs
- 5.44%Avg annual filing rate
- 10.9%Peak (2006)
- 3Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 200% over the past 12 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.7%Housing insecurity
- 3.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.0%Food insecurity
- 3.2%SNAP enrollment
- 3.3%Transit barriers
- 3.7%No health insurance
- 11.1%Frequent mental distress
- 20.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fairmount Boulevard Historic District
Severe burden reaches 28%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.4/10.
Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.2/10. It sits 1.4 points below the Cuyahoga County average of 4.6.
SNAP participation runs 3.2% against 15.2% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 48 filings here across 12 tracked years.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.5% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Filings peaked in 2006 at 10.9% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 5.4% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 25% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 39035141400
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39035141400?
Census tract 39035141400 in the Fairmount Boulevard Historic District neighborhood scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39035141400?
Median gross rent is $1,239/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 81% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39035141400?
2.4% of residents in tract 39035141400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,520.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39035141400?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 8th, household 12th, minority 30th, housing 8th.
Q5
Is tract 39035141400 considered part of Fairmount Boulevard Historic District?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39035141400 fall within Fairmount Boulevard Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39035141400?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 48 eviction filings across 12 validated years in tract 39035141400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.44% of renter households, peaking at 10.9% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39035141400 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39035141400 compare to Cleveland Heights overall?
Tract 39035141400 scores 3.2/10, lower than the parent city of Cleveland Heights at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cleveland Heights eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 39035141400 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cleveland Heights
Top eight tracts in Cleveland Heights ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · OH
Forest Hill Overlook
6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · OH
The Highlands
6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · OH
Crestwood
6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · OH
Coventry Village
6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · OH
Quilliams Highlands
6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · OH
Cedarbrook
5.2
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
Coventry Village
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
Cain Park Village
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Related