Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #65,414 of 84,120 nationally
Cedar Taylor Eviction Risk: Lower , University Heights
Tract 39035187103 · Cuyahoga County, OH · pop 3,015 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
With a score of 3.1/10, tract 39035187103 in the Cedar Taylor area of University Heights, OH reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Severe burden reaches 34%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11%
Stable renters 18%
Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units1,248
Renter share28.8%
SVI overall0.22
Poverty rate10.9%
Median income$107,552
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
33
th percentile
Low
Within county
28
th percentile
Low
Within state
33
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across University Heights and the region
Centroid at 41.4994, -81.5466 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cedar Taylor scores 3.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from University Heights
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
10.9% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$1,418 rent vs county FMR
6.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from University Heights
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from University Heights
7.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from University Heights
6.3
How Cedar Taylor compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 22
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 36%Socioeconomic
- 38%Household composition
- 73%Racial/ethnic minority
- 6%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 41%Grade A
- 58%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 256Total filings over 12 yrs
- 7.52%Avg annual filing rate
- 9.9%Peak (2013)
- 22Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 175% over the past 12 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.6%Housing insecurity
- 10.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 15.3%Food insecurity
- 13.0%SNAP enrollment
- 8.7%Transit barriers
- 6.2%No health insurance
- 16.1%Frequent mental distress
- 25.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Cedar Taylor
The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 8.2/10. It sits 1.5 points below the Cuyahoga County average of 4.6. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.2/10.
On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.4/10. Cost burden runs 37% here against 43.0% across Cuyahoga County. The voucher gap is 17.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
The filing record is not thin: 256 evictions over 12 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2013 at 9.9% of renter households. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Cleveland. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 7.5% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 22% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3/10.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 39035187103
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39035187103?
Census tract 39035187103 in the Cedar Taylor neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39035187103?
Median gross rent is $1,418/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39035187103?
10.9% of residents in tract 39035187103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,015.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39035187103?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 22th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 36th, household 38th, minority 73th, housing 6th.
Q5
Is tract 39035187103 considered part of Cedar Taylor?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39035187103 fall within Cedar Taylor (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39035187103?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 256 eviction filings across 12 validated years in tract 39035187103 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.52% of renter households, peaking at 9.9% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39035187103 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39035187103 compare to University Heights overall?
Tract 39035187103 scores 3.1/10, lower than the parent city of University Heights at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from University Heights; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 39035187103 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in University Heights
Top eight tracts in University Heights ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related