Sunbury Eviction Risk: Lower

Severe burden reaches 18%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.2/10.

Disability prevalence runs 18.9% against 31.5% nationally. Running cool, state political climate reads 2.4/10.

SNAP participation runs 5.0% against 15.2% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 191 filings here across 9 tracked years. The voucher gap is 14.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Filings peaked in 2005 at 23.5% of renter households. In a typical year about 9.8% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 29% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 21% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.