Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Northwest Boulevard Eviction Risk: Lower , Columbus

Tract 39049008500 · Franklin County, OH · pop 5,420 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Tract 39049008500 sits in the Northwest Boulevard area of Grandview Heights, OH, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. It is home to 5,420 residents. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 8.6/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 37% Owners 40%
Tract context
Occupied units2,648
Renter share60.0%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate7.3%
Median income$99,573

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Northwest Boulevard
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Columbus
Very Low
Within county
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#302 of 328 tracts In Franklin County
Very Low
Within state
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#2,197 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Columbus and the region

Centroid at 39.9755, -83.0344 · click any tract to drill in

Why Northwest Boulevard scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Columbus
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
7.3% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,748 rent vs county FMR
7.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Columbus
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Columbus
8.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Columbus
3.9

How Northwest Boulevard compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Northwest Boulevard risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 008500Columbus: 4.34.3Columbusparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.24.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 10

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 289Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 2.78%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.3%Peak (2004)
  • 5Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390490085002002: 28 filings (3.18/100 renter HHs)2003: 14 filings (1.59/100 renter HHs)2004: 38 filings (4.32/100 renter HHs)2005: 27 filings (3.71/100 renter HHs)2006: 36 filings (4.95/100 renter HHs)2007: 31 filings (4.26/100 renter HHs)2008: 24 filings (3.30/100 renter HHs)2009: 22 filings (3.03/100 renter HHs)2010: 21 filings (2.23/100 renter HHs)2011: 18 filings (2.07/100 renter HHs)2012: 10 filings (1.15/100 renter HHs)2013: 15 filings (1.72/100 renter HHs)2015: 5 filings (0.57/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 82% over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 102Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.55×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 5 filings (7.46× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (4.48× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (9.09× baseline)2024-02-01: 4 filings (5.97× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (5.97× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2024-12-01: 4 filings (5.97× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (2.26× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-05-01: 6 filings (8.96× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (2.40× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (12.12× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2025-12-01: 5 filings (7.46× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Columbus, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Northwest Boulevard. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Northwest Boulevard

Disability prevalence runs 16.2% against 31.5% nationally. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.8/10.

17% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Against the Franklin County average of 4.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.4 points. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8/10.

The voucher gap is 21.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. The filing record is not thin: 289 evictions over 13 years of observation.

Housing insecurity runs 5.9% against 14.2% nationally. The worst year on record was 2004, when 4.3% of renter households were served.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 2.8% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 1.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 39049008500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39049008500?

Census tract 39049008500 in the Northwest Boulevard neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39049008500?

Median gross rent is $1,748/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39049008500?

7.3% of residents in tract 39049008500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,420.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39049008500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 6th, minority 20th, housing 35th.
Q5

Is tract 39049008500 considered part of Northwest Boulevard?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39049008500 fall within Northwest Boulevard (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39049008500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 289 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 39049008500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.78% of renter households, peaking at 4.3% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39049008500 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.55× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Columbus eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39049008500 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39049008500 compare to Columbus overall?

Tract 39049008500 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Columbus at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Columbus eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 39049008500 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Columbus

Top eight tracts in Columbus ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related