Skip to content
Neighborhood · Columbus, OH

Project QT Eviction Risk: Lower

1 census tracts · pop 2,934 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3.5/10 · range 3.5–3.5

Project QT maps to a single census tract in Columbus, OH and houses 2,934 people. Scored across those inputs it reaches 3.5/10, placing it in the Lower tier. Against a Columbus baseline of 28.8%, 56% of renters here cross the 30%-of-income line.

The severe-burden share is 37%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay. Pulling the other way is rent-regulation exposure, at 1.5/10.

At $1,663 a month, rents sit 28% over what the rest of Columbus commands. Court records for this tract carry 213 eviction filings.

The voucher gap is 15.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which shows up as churn rather than arrears. The worst year on record was 2005, when filings touched 8.4% of renter households. SNAP participation is 7.1% of households versus 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity affects 9.6% of adults, 8.2 points below the national rate. The most recent observed rate, 1.8% in 2015, is well off that peak. Among the 120 mapped neighborhoods of Columbus, it ranks #99 by risk, the lower third.

Against average income of $105,268, annual rent is only 19%, a wide affordability cushion.

One tract means one number: 3.5/10 applies directly to any address inside the boundary. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.

Risk score
3.5
Lower
1 tracts · population-weighted
Project QT vs Columbus How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
56.2% +95%
Columbus: 28.8%
Average gross rent
$1,663 +28%
Columbus: $1,295
Average HH income
$105,268 +61%
Columbus: $65,327
Poverty rate
12.5% -30%
Columbus: 17.9%
Renter share
41.2% -26%
Columbus: 55.9%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Project QT and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 3.5–3.5

Why Project QT scores 3.5

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 2.4–2.4 across tracts
2.4
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 6.6–6.6 across tracts
6.6
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 6.5–6.5 across tracts
6.5
Rent control risk
56% of income on rent · Range 1.5–1.5 across tracts
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 4.5–4.5 across tracts
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
41% renter households · Range 5.5–5.5 across tracts
5.5
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 4.0–4.0 across tracts
4.0
Economic stress
12.5% below poverty line · Range 3.1–3.1 across tracts
3.1
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 6.5–6.5 across tracts
6.5
Risk score comparison

Project QT vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Project QT score vs. parent city, state, U.S.3.5Project QTNeighborhood4.3Parent cityhost city4.0Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Project QT

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
39049007941 3.5 2,934 56% $1,663
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 16

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 19%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 11%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 39%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 34%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history in Project QT

Aggregated across 1 validated constituent tract. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households, pop-weighted.

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 213Total filings (sum)
  • 4.25%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.4%Peak year (2005)
  • 1.82%Latest filed (2015)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 239Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.1Avg monthly observed
  • 0.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 3.73×Ratio to baseline

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Tracked under Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Columbus, OH).

CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Project QT

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Project QT

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Project QT?

Project QT scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Project QT compare to Columbus overall?

Project QT scores 0.8 points lower than Columbus overall (4.3/10). Renters spend 56% of income on rent vs 29% citywide. Average rent: $1,663 vs $1,295.
Q3

What is the average rent in Project QT?

Average gross rent in Project QT is $1,663/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Project QT residents are renters?

41% of Project QT households are renter-occupied (vs 56% in Columbus). The neighborhood has 2,934 residents.
Q5

Is Project QT a high social-vulnerability area?

Project QT sits in the 16th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (low vulnerability). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Project QT for landlords?

Project QT carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3.5/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Columbus as a whole (4.3/10), this neighborhood is lower-risk.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Project QT?

Project QT has 3,126 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (72%), Hispanic / Latino (13.4%), Black (non-Hispanic) (5.3%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Project QT

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Columbus

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Project QT.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further