Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally

Whitehall Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 39049009251 · Franklin County, OH · pop 1,331

In Whitehall, census tract 39049009251 scores $1/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than about 74% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 55% of renter households, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,077 a month against an average household income of $52,962 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. Renters make up 93% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 51% Stable renters 42% Owners 7%
Tract context
Occupied units489
Renter share92.8%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate1.8%
Median income$52,962

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In Whitehall
Very Low
Within county
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#195 of 328 tracts In Franklin County
Moderate
Within state
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#1,513 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Moderate
National
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#48,083 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Whitehall and the region

Centroid at 39.9798, -82.8860 · click any tract to drill in

Why Whitehall scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Whitehall
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
1.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,077 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Whitehall
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Whitehall
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Whitehall
7.6

How Whitehall compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Whitehall risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.63.6This tracttract 009251Whitehall: 3.03.0Whitehallparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 71

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 865Total filings 2020-21
  • 11.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 18.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.60×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 5 filings (0.26× baseline)2020-02-01: 15 filings (0.98× baseline)2020-03-01: 7 filings (0.28× baseline)2020-04-01: 2 filings (0.10× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (0.13× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.04× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.05× baseline)2020-09-01: 10 filings (0.37× baseline)2020-10-01: 13 filings (0.49× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2020-12-01: 12 filings (0.59× baseline)2021-01-01: 4 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.07× baseline)2021-03-01: 6 filings (0.24× baseline)2021-04-01: 6 filings (0.30× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.09× baseline)2021-06-01: 10 filings (0.63× baseline)2021-07-01: 9 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-08-01: 13 filings (0.65× baseline)2021-09-01: 10 filings (0.37× baseline)2021-10-01: 5 filings (0.19× baseline)2021-11-01: 12 filings (1.64× baseline)2021-12-01: 19 filings (0.93× baseline)2022-01-01: 19 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 33 filings (2.20× baseline)2022-03-01: 10 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-04-01: 13 filings (0.65× baseline)2022-05-01: 12 filings (0.54× baseline)2022-06-01: 9 filings (0.56× baseline)2022-07-01: 8 filings (0.35× baseline)2022-08-01: 19 filings (0.95× baseline)2022-09-01: 14 filings (0.52× baseline)2022-10-01: 28 filings (1.06× baseline)2022-11-01: 9 filings (1.23× baseline)2022-12-01: 6 filings (0.30× baseline)2023-01-01: 5 filings (0.26× baseline)2023-02-01: 21 filings (1.40× baseline)2023-03-01: 9 filings (0.36× baseline)2023-04-01: 18 filings (0.90× baseline)2023-05-01: 15 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-06-01: 9 filings (0.56× baseline)2023-07-01: 6 filings (0.26× baseline)2023-08-01: 17 filings (0.85× baseline)2023-09-01: 12 filings (0.45× baseline)2023-10-01: 18 filings (0.68× baseline)2023-11-01: 27 filings (3.68× baseline)2023-12-01: 6 filings (0.30× baseline)2024-01-01: 36 filings (1.89× baseline)2024-02-01: 11 filings (0.72× baseline)2024-03-01: 11 filings (0.44× baseline)2024-04-01: 9 filings (0.45× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.04× baseline)2024-06-01: 19 filings (1.19× baseline)2024-07-01: 33 filings (1.46× baseline)2024-08-01: 7 filings (0.35× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2024-12-01: 17 filings (0.84× baseline)2025-01-01: 18 filings (0.95× baseline)2025-02-01: 10 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-03-01: 10 filings (0.40× baseline)2025-04-01: 20 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 8 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-06-01: 8 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-07-01: 13 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-08-01: 9 filings (0.45× baseline)2025-09-01: 27 filings (1.01× baseline)2025-10-01: 12 filings (0.46× baseline)2025-11-01: 6 filings (0.82× baseline)2025-12-01: 17 filings (0.84× baseline)2026-01-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Columbus, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Whitehall

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Whitehall, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Franklin County average of 5.4 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of A ("Best"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 71st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 39049009251

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39049009251?

Census tract 39049009251 in Whitehall scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39049009251?

Median gross rent is $1,077/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39049009251?

1.8% of residents in tract 39049009251 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,331.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39049009251?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 70th, minority 91th, housing 59th.
Q5

Did eviction filings in tract 39049009251 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.60× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Columbus eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q6

What share of households in tract 39049009251 struggle to pay rent?

About 28.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 22.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 39049009251 compare to Whitehall overall?

Tract 39049009251 scores 3.6/10, higher than the parent city of Whitehall at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Whitehall; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 39049009251 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Whitehall

Top eight tracts in Whitehall ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related