Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally

Whitehall Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 39049009350 · Franklin County, OH · pop 3,257

Here is how census tract 39049009350, in Whitehall, looks to a landlord: a 6.2/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 3,257. On the national scale it ranks #17,109 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

56% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 29% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,253 a month while the average household earns $59,519 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 54% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 24% Owners 46%
Tract context
Occupied units1,352
Renter share54.2%
SVI overall0.75
Poverty rate7.0%
Median income$59,519

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 7 tracts In Whitehall
Very Low
Within county
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#183 of 328 tracts In Franklin County
Moderate
Within state
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#1,450 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Moderate
National
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#46,312 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Whitehall and the region

Centroid at 39.9641, -82.8638 · click any tract to drill in

Why Whitehall scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Whitehall
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
7.0% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,253 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Whitehall
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Whitehall
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Whitehall
7.6

How Whitehall compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Whitehall risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 009350Whitehall: 3.03.0Whitehallparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 75

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,235Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 11.97%Avg annual filing rate
  • 19.5%Peak (2012)
  • 89Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390490093502002: 67 filings (7.85/100 renter HHs)2003: 74 filings (8.67/100 renter HHs)2004: 71 filings (8.32/100 renter HHs)2005: 93 filings (10.21/100 renter HHs)2006: 75 filings (8.23/100 renter HHs)2007: 87 filings (9.55/100 renter HHs)2008: 59 filings (6.47/100 renter HHs)2009: 95 filings (10.43/100 renter HHs)2010: 124 filings (15.72/100 renter HHs)2011: 129 filings (18.45/100 renter HHs)2012: 136 filings (19.46/100 renter HHs)2013: 136 filings (19.46/100 renter HHs)2015: 89 filings (12.73/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 33% over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 682Total filings 2020-21
  • 8.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 8.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.99×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 8 filings (0.65× baseline)2020-02-01: 4 filings (0.48× baseline)2020-03-01: 6 filings (0.95× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 4 filings (0.48× baseline)2020-09-01: 14 filings (0.93× baseline)2020-10-01: 11 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.16× baseline)2020-12-01: 10 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 7 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.12× baseline)2021-03-01: 5 filings (0.79× baseline)2021-04-01: 4 filings (0.46× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2021-07-01: 5 filings (0.65× baseline)2021-08-01: 6 filings (0.72× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 6 filings (0.49× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 16 filings (1.60× baseline)2022-01-01: 9 filings (0.73× baseline)2022-02-01: 4 filings (0.48× baseline)2022-03-01: 11 filings (1.74× baseline)2022-04-01: 9 filings (1.04× baseline)2022-05-01: 8 filings (0.83× baseline)2022-06-01: 4 filings (0.43× baseline)2022-07-01: 11 filings (1.43× baseline)2022-08-01: 5 filings (0.60× baseline)2022-09-01: 7 filings (0.47× baseline)2022-10-01: 6 filings (0.49× baseline)2022-11-01: 22 filings (3.48× baseline)2022-12-01: 15 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-01-01: 7 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-02-01: 11 filings (1.32× baseline)2023-03-01: 11 filings (1.74× baseline)2023-04-01: 14 filings (1.61× baseline)2023-05-01: 8 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-06-01: 5 filings (0.54× baseline)2023-07-01: 6 filings (0.78× baseline)2023-08-01: 10 filings (1.20× baseline)2023-09-01: 11 filings (0.73× baseline)2023-10-01: 8 filings (0.65× baseline)2023-11-01: 10 filings (1.58× baseline)2023-12-01: 13 filings (1.30× baseline)2024-01-01: 12 filings (0.97× baseline)2024-02-01: 21 filings (2.52× baseline)2024-03-01: 10 filings (1.58× baseline)2024-04-01: 13 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (0.31× baseline)2024-06-01: 13 filings (1.39× baseline)2024-07-01: 16 filings (2.09× baseline)2024-08-01: 12 filings (1.44× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.07× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.08× baseline)2024-11-01: 10 filings (1.58× baseline)2024-12-01: 14 filings (1.40× baseline)2025-01-01: 14 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-02-01: 14 filings (1.68× baseline)2025-03-01: 7 filings (1.11× baseline)2025-04-01: 12 filings (1.38× baseline)2025-05-01: 21 filings (2.17× baseline)2025-06-01: 18 filings (1.93× baseline)2025-07-01: 18 filings (2.35× baseline)2025-08-01: 13 filings (1.56× baseline)2025-09-01: 13 filings (0.87× baseline)2025-10-01: 11 filings (0.89× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (0.47× baseline)2025-12-01: 18 filings (1.80× baseline)2026-01-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Columbus, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Whitehall

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Whitehall, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Franklin County average of 5.4 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 18.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 13.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 75th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 39049009350

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39049009350?

Census tract 39049009350 in Whitehall scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39049009350?

Median gross rent is $1,253/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39049009350?

7.0% of residents in tract 39049009350 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,257.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39049009350?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 75th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 63th, household 79th, minority 80th, housing 65th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39049009350?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,235 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 39049009350 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.97% of renter households, peaking at 19.5% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 39049009350 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.99× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Columbus eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 39049009350 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 39049009350 compare to Whitehall overall?

Tract 39049009350 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of Whitehall at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Whitehall; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Whitehall

Top eight tracts in Whitehall ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related