Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #21,564 of 84,120 nationally

Tuttle Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Columbus

Tract 39049001110 · Franklin County, OH · pop 2,996 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Tract 39049001110 sits in the Tuttle Park area of Columbus eviction risk, OH, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.7/10. The severe-burden share is 52%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 67% Stable renters 31% Owners 2%
Tract context
Occupied units1,140
Renter share98.2%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate66.2%
Median income$25,929

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Tuttle Park
Moderate
Within parent city
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#71 of 238 tracts In Columbus
Elevated
Within county
79 th percentile
Rank, 79th percentileLowHigh
#69 of 328 tracts In Franklin County
High
Within state
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#353 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Columbus and the region

Centroid at 40.0089, -83.0166 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tuttle Park scores 5.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Columbus
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
66.2% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$1,261 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Columbus
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Columbus
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Columbus
4.0

How Tuttle Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tuttle Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.75.7This tracttract 001110Columbus: 4.34.3Columbusparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.24.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 51

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 181Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 1.17%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.9%Peak (2002)
  • 6Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390490011102002: 31 filings (1.90/100 renter HHs)2003: 18 filings (1.10/100 renter HHs)2004: 26 filings (1.59/100 renter HHs)2005: 13 filings (1.32/100 renter HHs)2006: 12 filings (1.22/100 renter HHs)2007: 13 filings (1.32/100 renter HHs)2008: 15 filings (1.52/100 renter HHs)2009: 6 filings (0.61/100 renter HHs)2010: 13 filings (0.95/100 renter HHs)2011: 11 filings (1.17/100 renter HHs)2012: 9 filings (0.96/100 renter HHs)2013: 8 filings (0.85/100 renter HHs)2015: 6 filings (0.64/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 81% over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 64Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.39×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 3 filings (4.48× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2021-11-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Columbus, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tuttle Park

68% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far above the Franklin County average of 41.6%. Set annual rent against average income of $25,929 and the ratio lands at 58%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. The dominant input is economic stress at 10/10.

The poverty rate is 66%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. This is renter territory: 98% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.5/10. Food insecurity runs 30.4% against 17.8% nationally. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8/10.

Against the Franklin County average of 4.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.3 points. SNAP participation runs 25.7% against 15.2% nationally.

The filing record is not thin: 181 evictions over 13 years of observation.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 39049001110

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39049001110?

Census tract 39049001110 in the Tuttle Park neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39049001110?

Median gross rent is $1,261/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 68% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39049001110?

66.2% of residents in tract 39049001110 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,996.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39049001110?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 70th, household 0th, minority 47th, housing 97th.
Q5

Is tract 39049001110 considered part of Tuttle Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39049001110 fall within Tuttle Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39049001110?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 181 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 39049001110 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.17% of renter households, peaking at 1.9% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39049001110 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.39× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Columbus eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39049001110 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39049001110 compare to Columbus overall?

Tract 39049001110 scores 5.7/10, higher than the parent city of Columbus at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Columbus eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 39049001110 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Columbus

Top eight tracts in Columbus ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related