Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #23,808 of 84,120 nationally

Brighton-Dryden Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , South Zanesville

Tract 39119912200 · Muskingum County, OH · pop 3,382 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

With a score of 5.5/10, tract 39119912200 in the Brighton-Dryden Historic District area of Zanesville, OH reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.5/10.

Risk score
5.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25% Stable renters 25% Owners 50%
Tract context
Occupied units1,304
Renter share50.0%
SVI overall0.79
Poverty rate20.7%
Median income$49,359

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Brighton-Dryden Historic District
Very High
Within parent city
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 8 tracts In South Zanesville
Moderate
Within county
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 21 tracts In Muskingum County
High
Within state
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#527 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across South Zanesville and the region

Centroid at 39.9266, -82.0292 · click any tract to drill in

Why Brighton-Dryden Historic District scores 5.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from South Zanesville
3.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.0
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
20.7% poverty · this tract
5.2
Supply constraint
$889 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from South Zanesville
8.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from South Zanesville
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from South Zanesville
8.4

How Brighton-Dryden Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Brighton-Dryden Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.5This tracttract 9122003.9South Zanesvilleparent city4.2Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 79

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 392Total filings over 9 yrs
  • 8.58%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.9%Peak (2006)
  • 50Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 39119912200
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 9 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Brighton-Dryden Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Brighton-Dryden Historic District

The severe-burden share is 30%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Running hot, housing-court posture reads 8.4/10.

49% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, above the Muskingum County average of 41.4%. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8/10. Against the Muskingum County average of 4.2, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.3 points.

The poverty rate is 21%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Court records carry 392 eviction filings across 9 observed years.

The worst year on record was 2006, when 12.9% of renter households were served. Average gross rent is $889, 8% above the Zanesville average.

In a typical year about 8.6% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 72nd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the OH average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.3 points hotter.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 39119912200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39119912200?

Census tract 39119912200 in the Brighton-Dryden Historic District neighborhood scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39119912200?

Median gross rent is $889/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39119912200?

20.7% of residents in tract 39119912200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,382.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39119912200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 79th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 86th, household 76th, minority 36th, housing 64th.
Q5

Is tract 39119912200 considered part of Brighton-Dryden Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39119912200 fall within Brighton-Dryden Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39119912200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 392 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 39119912200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.58% of renter households, peaking at 12.9% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 39119912200 struggle to pay rent?

About 15.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 39119912200 compare to South Zanesville overall?

Tract 39119912200 scores 5.5/10, higher than the parent city of South Zanesville at 3.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from South Zanesville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in South Zanesville

Top eight tracts in South Zanesville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related