Skip to content
Neighborhood · Zanesville, OH

Fairmont Avenue Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate

1 census tracts · pop 3,417 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 5.8/10 · range 5.8–5.8

Fairmont Avenue Historic District is a one-tract neighborhood of Zanesville, OH and houses 3,417 people. That produces an Eviction Risk Score of 5.8/10, Moderate tier. The strongest single driver of the headline number is tenant-organizing strength at 9.5/10.

Cost burden runs 41% against 30.5% citywide, putting Fairmont Avenue Historic District 10.2% over its own city. Sitting well above the midpoint is housing-court posture at 8.4/10. Severe burden reaches 19%. A tenant at that level absorbs no shock: one cut shift or one repair bill converts directly into arrears.

The poverty rate is 24%, which shows up in this model as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. On the high side is rent-regulation exposure at 8/10. The filing record is not thin: 223 evictions logged in this tract.

Filing activity peaked in 2018 at 4.6% of renter households. Judgments average 2.6% of renter households a year, the share of filings that actually convert to an order. For a like-for-like read, Putnam Historic District and McIntire Terrace Historic District score within a fraction of it.

Against average income of $51,094, annual rent is only 19%, a wide affordability cushion. Average gross rent runs $810, close to the Zanesville average.

54% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

One tract means one number: 5.8/10 applies directly to any address inside the boundary. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.

Risk score
5.8
Moderate
1 tracts · population-weighted
Fairmont Avenue Historic District vs Zanesville How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
40.7% +33%
Zanesville: 30.5%
Average gross rent
$810 -1%
Zanesville: $821
Average HH income
$51,094 +31%
Zanesville: $39,085
Poverty rate
24.1% -10%
Zanesville: 26.8%
Renter share
53.9% -4%
Zanesville: 56.2%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Fairmont Avenue Historic District and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 5.8–5.8

Why Fairmont Avenue Historic District scores 5.8

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 2.4–2.4 across tracts
2.4
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 3.0–3.0 across tracts
3.0
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 3.7–3.7 across tracts
3.7
Rent control risk
41% of income on rent · Range 8.0–8.0 across tracts
8.0
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 2.0–2.0 across tracts
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
54% renter households · Range 9.5–9.5 across tracts
9.5
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 8.4–8.4 across tracts
8.4
Economic stress
24.1% below poverty line · Range 6.0–6.0 across tracts
6.0
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 4.2–4.2 across tracts
4.2
Risk score comparison

Fairmont Avenue Historic District vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Fairmont Avenue Historic District score vs. parent city, state, U.S.5.8Fairmont Avenue HiNeighborhood4.6Parent cityhost city4.0Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Fairmont Avenue Historic District

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
39119911700 5.8 3,417 41% $810
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 65

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 69%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 42%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 36%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 72%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history in Fairmont Avenue Historic District

Aggregated across 1 validated constituent tract. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households, pop-weighted.

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 223Total filings (sum)
  • 4.20%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.6%Peak year (2018)
  • 4.57%Latest filed (2018)
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Fairmont Avenue Historic District

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Fairmont Avenue Historic District

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Fairmont Avenue Historic District?

Fairmont Avenue Historic District scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Fairmont Avenue Historic District compare to Zanesville overall?

Fairmont Avenue Historic District scores 1.2 points higher than Zanesville overall (4.6/10). Renters spend 41% of income on rent vs 31% citywide. Average rent: $810 vs $821.
Q3

What is the average rent in Fairmont Avenue Historic District?

Average gross rent in Fairmont Avenue Historic District is $810/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Fairmont Avenue Historic District residents are renters?

54% of Fairmont Avenue Historic District households are renter-occupied (vs 56% in Zanesville). The neighborhood has 3,417 residents.
Q5

Is Fairmont Avenue Historic District a high social-vulnerability area?

Fairmont Avenue Historic District sits in the 65th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (moderately vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Fairmont Avenue Historic District for landlords?

Fairmont Avenue Historic District carries a moderate-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (5.8/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Zanesville as a whole (4.6/10), this neighborhood is higher-risk.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Fairmont Avenue Historic District?

Fairmont Avenue Historic District has 3,386 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (78.7%), Black (non-Hispanic) (8.5%), Hispanic / Latino (7.1%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Fairmont Avenue Historic District

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Zanesville

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Fairmont Avenue Historic District.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further