Skip to content
Neighborhood · Landen, OH

Carrousel Eviction Risk: Lower

1 census tracts · pop 2,947 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3.4/10 · range 3.4–3.4

Carrousel maps to a single census tract in Landen, OH, population 2,947. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.4/10, in the Lower tier. The main counterweight is economic stress, at 1/10.

Cost burden runs 30% against 19.8% citywide, putting Carrousel 10.6% over its own city. Severe burden reaches 18%. A tenant at that level absorbs no shock: one cut shift or one repair bill converts directly into arrears. Running cool is eviction-process difficulty, at 2.6/10.

The voucher gap is 14.5%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which shows up as churn rather than arrears. CDC survey data puts housing insecurity at 6.9% of adults, against 14.2% nationally.

Disability prevalence reaches 19.3% against a 31.5% national average, which raises the odds a reasonable-accommodation request accompanies any dispute. Average gross rent is $1,474, 6% below the Landen average of $1,569.

Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Annual rent works out to 20% of average household income of $86,458. 51% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Because the boundary contains one tract, 3.4/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
1 tracts · population-weighted
Carrousel vs Landen How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
30.4% +54%
Landen: 19.8%
Average gross rent
$1,474 -6%
Landen: $1,569
Average HH income
$86,458 -18%
Landen: $105,948
Poverty rate
3.0% -33%
Landen: 4.5%
Renter share
51.1% +373%
Landen: 10.8%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Carrousel and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 3.4–3.4

Why Carrousel scores 3.4

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 2.4–2.4 across tracts
2.4
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 3.5–3.5 across tracts
3.5
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 4.1–4.1 across tracts
4.1
Rent control risk
30% of income on rent · Range 3.3–3.3 across tracts
3.3
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 2.6–2.6 across tracts
2.6
Tenant organizing strength
51% renter households · Range 3.5–3.5 across tracts
3.5
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 3.1–3.1 across tracts
3.1
Economic stress
3.0% below poverty line · Range 1.0–1.0 across tracts
1.0
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 6.5–6.5 across tracts
6.5
Risk score comparison

Carrousel vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Carrousel score vs. parent city, state, U.S.3.4CarrouselNeighborhood3.2Parent cityhost city4.0Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Carrousel

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
39165032011 3.4 2,947 30% $1,474
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 14

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 10%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 7%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 41%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 50%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Carrousel

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Carrousel

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Carrousel?

Carrousel scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Carrousel compare to Landen overall?

Carrousel scores 0.2 points higher than Landen overall (3.2/10). Renters spend 30% of income on rent vs 20% citywide. Average rent: $1,474 vs $1,569.
Q3

What is the average rent in Carrousel?

Average gross rent in Carrousel is $1,474/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Carrousel residents are renters?

51% of Carrousel households are renter-occupied (vs 11% in Landen). The neighborhood has 2,947 residents.
Q5

Is Carrousel a high social-vulnerability area?

Carrousel sits in the 14th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (low vulnerability). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Carrousel for landlords?

Carrousel carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3.4/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Landen as a whole (3.2/10), this neighborhood is in line with the citywide level.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Carrousel?

Carrousel has 3,276 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (74.8%), Asian (non-Hispanic) (16.2%), Hispanic / Latino (7.4%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Landen

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Carrousel.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further