Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #65,414 of 84,120 nationally

Fair Heights Eviction Risk: Lower , Tulsa

Tract 40143003700 · Tulsa County, OK · pop 2,654 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 40143003700 covers part of the Fair Heights area of Tulsa, OK, and scores 3.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,654. The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 16% Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units1,261
Renter share27.4%
SVI overall0.13
Poverty rate11.4%
Median income$77,379

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Fair Heights
Moderate
Within parent city
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#101 of 140 tracts In Tulsa
Low
Within county
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#122 of 208 tracts In Tulsa County
Moderate
Within state
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#754 of 1,205 tracts In Oklahoma
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tulsa and the region

Centroid at 36.1406, -95.9314 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fair Heights scores 3.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tulsa
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.2
State political climate
Oklahoma legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
11.4% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,355 rent vs county FMR
6.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tulsa
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tulsa
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tulsa
2.5

How Fair Heights compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fair Heights risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.13.1This tracttract 003700Tulsa: 3.43.4Tulsaparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 13

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fair Heights

Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10. At $1,355 a month, rents run 29% over what the rest of Tulsa commands.

On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.5/10. The severe-burden share is 11%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The voucher gap is 14.9%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

It sits 0.6 points below the Tulsa County average of 3.7. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

Nationally it ranks #65,414 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.1/10.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 42% of renters. Annual rent works out to 21% of average household income of $77,379.

27% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 40143003700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40143003700?

Census tract 40143003700 in the Fair Heights neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 40143003700?

Median gross rent is $1,355/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 40143003700?

11.4% of residents in tract 40143003700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,654.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 40143003700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 13th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 43th, minority 39th, housing 2th.
Q5

Is tract 40143003700 considered part of Fair Heights?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 40143003700 fall within Fair Heights (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 40143003700 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 40143003700 compare to Tulsa overall?

Tract 40143003700 scores 3.1/10, lower than the parent city of Tulsa at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tulsa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 40143003700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tulsa

Top eight tracts in Tulsa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related