Forest Trails Eviction Risk: Lower , Tulsa

On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.2/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Severe burden reaches 14%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Food insecurity runs 8.7% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 6.2% against 15.2% nationally.

It sits 0.7 points below the Tulsa County average of 3.7. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.7/10. Rent consumes only 12% of average household income of $112,031, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. 37% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.