Renaissance Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tulsa

Against Tulsa County at 40.3%, 61% of renters here are cost-burdened. Annualized rent equals 57% of average household income of $21,829, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. The dominant input is economic stress at 10/10.

The poverty rate is 45%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. This is renter territory: 89% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10.

On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.5/10. SNAP participation runs 25.8% against 15.2% nationally.

Against the Tulsa County average of 3.7, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.1 points. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 15.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

On the national scale it lands near the 58th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.