Rosewood Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tulsa

Disability prevalence runs 50.8% against 31.5% nationally. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Against Tulsa County at 40.3%, 50% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Severe burden reaches 17%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The poverty rate is 23%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

It sits 1.1 points above the Tulsa County average of 3.7. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.5/10. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 18.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

At $964 a month, rents run 8% under what the rest of Tulsa commands. That is riskier than roughly 58% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the OK average is 3.8, so this tract runs 1.0 points hotter.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. Annual rent works out to 26% of average household income of $44,779. 56% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.