Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #4,782 of 84,120 nationally

Reading Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 42011002300 · Berks County, PA · pop 2,690

Eviction risk in Reading eviction risk centers on tract 42011002300, which scores 7.1/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 2,690 residents. That is riskier than about 95% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 63% of renter households, a severe level, and 29% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $991 a month while the average household earns $35,725 a year, roughly 33% of income at the averages. About 53% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 34% Stable renters 20% Owners 46%
Tract context
Occupied units802
Renter share53.4%
SVI overall0.97
Poverty rate35.8%
Median income$35,725

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 28 tracts In Reading
Elevated
Within county
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#9 of 107 tracts In Berks County
Very High
Within state
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#54 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Very High
National
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#4,782 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Reading and the region

Centroid at 40.3284, -75.9261 · click any tract to drill in

Why Reading scores 7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Reading
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
35.8% poverty · this tract
8.9
Supply constraint
$991 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Reading
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Reading
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Reading
8.2

How Reading compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Reading risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.07.0This tracttract 002300Reading: 4.44.4Readingparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 97

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 358Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 12.59%Avg annual filing rate
  • 10.8%Peak (2006)
  • 58Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 420110023002000: 40 filings (10.96/100 renter HHs)2001: 46 filings (12.60/100 renter HHs)2002: 56 filings (15.34/100 renter HHs)2003: 50 filings (13.70/100 renter HHs)2004: 53 filings (14.52/100 renter HHs)2005: 55 filings (10.22/100 renter HHs)2006: 58 filings (10.78/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 45% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Reading

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Reading eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Berks County average of 5.7 and above the Pennsylvania statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 97th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 358 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 12.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 10.8% of renter households in 2006.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 42011002300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42011002300?

Census tract 42011002300 in Reading scores 7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42011002300?

Median gross rent is $991/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42011002300?

35.8% of residents in tract 42011002300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,690.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42011002300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 97th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 97th, minority 82th, housing 76th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42011002300?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 358 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42011002300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 12.59% of renter households, peaking at 10.8% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 42011002300 compare to Reading overall?

Tract 42011002300 scores 7/10, higher than the parent city of Reading at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Reading eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Reading

Top eight tracts in Reading ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related