Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #4,396 of 84,120 nationally

Reading Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 42011001900 · Berks County, PA · pop 1,916

Census tract 42011001900 runs through Reading. With 1,916 residents, it scores 7.2/10 for landlords. It lands near the 96th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 51% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $770 monthly, set against $19,422 in average yearly household income, roughly 48% of income at the averages. About 87% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
7.1
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 45% Stable renters 42% Owners 13%
Tract context
Occupied units975
Renter share86.6%
SVI overall0.97
Poverty rate48.0%
Median income$19,422

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 28 tracts In Reading
High
Within county
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 107 tracts In Berks County
Very High
Within state
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#23 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Very High
National
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#4,396 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Reading and the region

Centroid at 40.3344, -75.9163 · click any tract to drill in

Why Reading scores 7.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Reading
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
48.0% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$770 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Reading
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Reading
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Reading
8.2

How Reading compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Reading risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.17.1This tracttract 001900Reading: 4.44.4Readingparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 97

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 468Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 8.85%Avg annual filing rate
  • 13.6%Peak (2004)
  • 62Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 420110019002000: 58 filings (7.32/100 renter HHs)2001: 54 filings (6.82/100 renter HHs)2002: 49 filings (6.19/100 renter HHs)2003: 66 filings (8.33/100 renter HHs)2004: 108 filings (13.64/100 renter HHs)2005: 71 filings (10.49/100 renter HHs)2006: 62 filings (9.16/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Reading

The score leans hardest on economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Reading eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well above the Berks County average of 5.7 and above the Pennsylvania statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 97th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 468 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 8.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 13.6% of renter households in 2004.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 42011001900

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42011001900?

Census tract 42011001900 in Reading scores 7.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42011001900?

Median gross rent is $770/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42011001900?

48.0% of residents in tract 42011001900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,916.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42011001900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 97th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 100th, minority 72th, housing 88th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42011001900?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 468 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42011001900 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.85% of renter households, peaking at 13.6% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 42011001900 compare to Reading overall?

Tract 42011001900 scores 7.1/10, higher than the parent city of Reading at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Reading eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Reading

Top eight tracts in Reading ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related