Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally
Crestmont Farms Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 42017100103 · Bucks County, PA · pop 2,397 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
42017100103 is a census tract in the Crestmont Farms area of Bucks County, PA. It scores 5/10 for landlords. It is home to 2,397 residents. Against Bucks County at 41.8%, around two-thirds of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 27%
Stable renters 13%
Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units1,015
Renter share40.0%
SVI overall0.74
Poverty rate6.8%
Median income$64,970
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
83
th percentile
High
Within state
64
th percentile
Elevated
National
61
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Bucks County and the region
Centroid at 40.0683, -74.9722 · click any tract to drill in
Why Crestmont Farms scores 5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
State baseline
3.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.2
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
6.8% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,237 rent vs county FMR
1.9
Rent control risk
State baseline
3.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0
How Crestmont Farms compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 74
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 52%Socioeconomic
- 91%Household composition
- 47%Racial/ethnic minority
- 78%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 503Total filings over 7 yrs
- 15.14%Avg annual filing rate
- 17.7%Peak (2001)
- 81Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 7 months.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Crestmont Farms
Severe burden reaches 35%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 8.6/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.7/10.
Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.9/10. Against the Bucks County average of 4.0, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.0 points.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 503 filings here across 7 tracked years. The worst year on record was 2001, when 17.7% of renter households were served.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 15.1% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #32,842 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. Average gross rent runs $1,237 a month.
Annual rent works out to 23% of average household income of $64,970.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 42017100103
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42017100103?
Census tract 42017100103 in the Crestmont Farms neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 42017100103?
Median gross rent is $1,237/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 66% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 42017100103?
6.8% of residents in tract 42017100103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,397.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 42017100103?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 74th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 52th, household 91th, minority 47th, housing 78th.
Q5
Is tract 42017100103 considered part of Crestmont Farms?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42017100103 fall within Crestmont Farms (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42017100103?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 503 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42017100103 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 15.14% of renter households, peaking at 17.7% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Was tract 42017100103 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related