Skip to content
Neighborhood · Philadelphia, PA

Hunting Park Eviction Risk: Elevated

2 census tracts · pop 6,748 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 7/10 · range 5.6–7

Hunting Park is a hispanic / latino neighborhood in Philadelphia with 2 census tracts and a population of 6,748 residents. The neighborhood's pop-weighted eviction-risk score of 7/10 (Elevated tier) blends state law, county-level filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty. 76% of renters here pay at least 30% of household income on rent, and 61% are severely cost-burdened (≥50% of income). Average gross rent of $1,182/month sits 15% lower than the Philadelphia citywide average ($1,397).

Risk score
7
Elevated
2 tracts · population-weighted
Hunting Park vs Philadelphia How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
75.9% +142%
Philadelphia: 31.4%
Average gross rent
$1,182 -15%
Philadelphia: $1,397
Average HH income
$32,053 -47%
Philadelphia: $60,698
Poverty rate
56.5% +157%
Philadelphia: 22.0%
Renter share
42.7% -11%
Philadelphia: 48.2%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Hunting Park and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 2 tracts span score 5.6–7

Why Hunting Park scores 7

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 3.4–3.4 across tracts
3.4
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 8.2–8.2 across tracts
8.2
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 8.0–8.0 across tracts
8.0
Rent control risk
76% of income on rent · Range 6.0–6.0 across tracts
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 7.5–7.5 across tracts
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
43% renter households · Range 7.5–7.5 across tracts
7.5
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 7.5–7.5 across tracts
7.5
Economic stress
56.5% below poverty line · Range 3.0–10.0 across tracts
10.0
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 1.6–5.0 across tracts
1.6
Risk score comparison

Hunting Park vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Hunting Park score vs. parent city, state, U.S.Hunting Park: 7.07.0Hunting ParkNeighborhoodParent city: 5.55.5Parent cityhost cityState: 4.34.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

2 tracts in Hunting Park

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
42101019700 7 6,746 76% $1,182
42101980500 5.6 2
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 94

Pop-weighted across 2 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 100%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 68%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 98%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 61%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history in Hunting Park

Aggregated across 1 validated constituent tract. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households, pop-weighted.

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 276Total filings (sum)
  • 6.49%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.1%Peak year (2016)
  • 7.10%Latest filed (2016)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 192Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.5Avg monthly observed
  • 5.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.48×Ratio to baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline. Tracked under Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Palm Beach).

Frequently asked

About Hunting Park

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Hunting Park?

Hunting Park scores 7/10 (Elevated tier) across 2 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Hunting Park compare to Philadelphia overall?

Hunting Park scores 1.5 points higher than Philadelphia overall (5.5/10). Renters spend 76% of income on rent vs 31% citywide. Average rent: $1,182 vs $1,397.
Q3

What is the average rent in Hunting Park?

Average gross rent in Hunting Park is $1,182/month (pop-weighted across 2 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 76% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Hunting Park residents are renters?

43% of Hunting Park households are renter-occupied (vs 48% in Philadelphia). The neighborhood has 6,748 residents.
Q5

Is Hunting Park a high social-vulnerability area?

Hunting Park sits in the 94th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (highly vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

Which tracts in Hunting Park have the highest eviction risk?

The highest-risk constituent tract in Hunting Park is census tract 42101019700 (score 7/10). Across the 2 tracts in this neighborhood the score ranges from 5.6 to 7, a spread of 1.4 points.
Q7

How safe is Hunting Park for landlords?

Hunting Park carries a elevated-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (7/10). Pop-weighted across 2 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Philadelphia as a whole (5.5/10), this neighborhood is higher-risk.
Q8

What is the demographic breakdown of Hunting Park?

Hunting Park has 6,588 residents (Hispanic / Latino Neighborhood). Top groups: Hispanic / Latino (82.7%), Black (non-Hispanic) (11.8%), Asian (non-Hispanic) (3.3%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Hunting Park

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Philadelphia

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Hunting Park.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further