Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #14,906 of 84,120 nationally

Wayland Eviction Risk: Elevated , Cranston

Tract 44007003500 · Providence County, RI · pop 5,077 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 44007003500 covers part of the Wayland area of Providence, RI, and scores 6.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,077. Against Providence County at 43.2%, 60% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
6.6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 35% Stable renters 24% Owners 41%
Tract context
Occupied units2,668
Renter share59.1%
SVI overall0.37
Poverty rate13.3%
Median income$82,778

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Wayland
Very High
Within parent city
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#33 of 42 tracts In Cranston
Low
Within county
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#54 of 145 tracts In Providence County
Elevated
Within state
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#66 of 247 tracts In Rhode Island
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cranston and the region

Centroid at 41.8296, -71.3837 · click any tract to drill in

Why Wayland scores 6.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cranston
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Rhode Island legislature & governorship
5.5
Economic stress
13.3% poverty · this tract
3.3
Supply constraint
$1,690 rent vs county FMR
5.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cranston
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cranston
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cranston
6.5

How Wayland compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Wayland risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.66.6This tracttract 003500Cranston: 4.34.3Cranstonparent cityCounty: 5.75.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.35.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 37

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 32Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 1.01%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.1%Peak (2015)
  • 14Filings in 2016 (latest validated)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 85Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.05×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 7 filings (5.60× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Portland, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Wayland. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Wayland

Severe burden reaches 23%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 7.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.5/10.

Average gross rent is $1,690, 20% above the Providence average. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 32 filings here across 2 tracked years.

It sits 0.9 points above the Providence County average of 5.7. SNAP participation runs 6.9% against 15.2% nationally.

On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 7/10. Adults with no health insurance runs 4.3% against 11.3% nationally.

The worst year on record was 2015, when 1.1% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

In a typical year about 1.0% of renter households face a filing.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 44007003500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 44007003500?

Census tract 44007003500 in the Wayland neighborhood scores 6.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 44007003500?

Median gross rent is $1,690/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 44007003500?

13.3% of residents in tract 44007003500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,077.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 44007003500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 37th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 40th, household 10th, minority 41th, housing 64th.
Q5

Is tract 44007003500 considered part of Wayland?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 44007003500 fall within Wayland (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 44007003500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 32 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 44007003500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.01% of renter households, peaking at 1.1% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 44007003500 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.05× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Portland, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 44007003500 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 44007003500 compare to Cranston overall?

Tract 44007003500 scores 6.6/10, higher than the parent city of Cranston at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cranston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 44007003500 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cranston

Top eight tracts in Cranston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related