Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #76,223 of 84,120 nationally

Haig Point Eviction Risk: Lower , Daufuskie Island

Tract 45013002101 · Beaufort County, SC · pop 569 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Census tract 45013002101 runs through the Haig Point neighborhood of Daufuskie Island. With 569 residents, it scores 3.4/10 for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 4% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

0% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $153,821 a year. About 2% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.8
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 2% Owners 98%
Tract context
Occupied units389
Renter share2.1%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate2.5%
Median income$153,821

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Haig Point
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Daufuskie Island
Moderate
Within county
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#35 of 42 tracts In Beaufort County
Very Low
Within state
5 th percentile
Rank, 5th percentileLowHigh
#1,247 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Daufuskie Island and the region

Centroid at 32.1187, -80.8612 · click any tract to drill in

Why Haig Point scores 1.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Daufuskie Island
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
2.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Daufuskie Island
1.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Daufuskie Island
1.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Daufuskie Island
1.7

How Haig Point compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Haig Point risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.81.8This tracttract 002101Daufuskie Island: 1.91.9Daufuskie Islandparent cityCounty: 3.13.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 4

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 3Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 3.00%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.0%Peak (2012)
  • 1Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 450130021012010: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2011: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2012: 2 filings (4.00/100 renter HHs)2013: 1 filings (2.00/100 renter HHs)2014: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Haig Point

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Daufuskie Island, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Beaufort County average of 5.5 and below the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 4th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 3 eviction filings here over 2 tracked years, with about 3.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.0% of renter households in 2012.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 45013002101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45013002101?

Census tract 45013002101 in the Haig Point neighborhood scores 1.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 45013002101?

2.5% of residents in tract 45013002101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 569.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 45013002101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 0th, household 4th, minority 53th, housing 32th.
Q4

Is tract 45013002101 considered part of Haig Point?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45013002101 fall within Haig Point (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45013002101?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 3 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 45013002101 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.00% of renter households, peaking at 4.0% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 45013002101 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 45013002101 compare to Daufuskie Island overall?

Tract 45013002101 scores 1.8/10, right in line with the parent city of Daufuskie Island at 1.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Daufuskie Island; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related