Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #18,240 of 84,120 nationally

King Street Fashion District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Charleston

Tract 45019000400 · Charleston County, SC · pop 3,462 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Eviction risk in the King Street Fashion District area of Charleston centers on tract 45019000400, which scores 6.1/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 3,462 residents. That is riskier than roughly 77% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

68% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 40% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,128 monthly, set against $36,750 in average yearly household income, roughly 37% of income at the averages. Renters make up 78% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 53% Stable renters 25% Owners 22%
Tract context
Occupied units1,102
Renter share77.6%
SVI overall0.36
Poverty rate39.0%
Median income$36,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In King Street Fashion District
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 45 tracts In Charleston
Very High
Within county
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 98 tracts In Charleston County
Very High
Within state
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#179 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Charleston and the region

Centroid at 32.7825, -79.9353 · click any tract to drill in

Why King Street Fashion District scores 5.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Charleston
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
39.0% poverty · this tract
9.7
Supply constraint
$1,128 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Charleston
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Charleston
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Charleston
3.0

How King Street Fashion District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
King Street Fashion District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.55.5This tracttract 000400Charleston: 2.62.6Charlestonparent cityCounty: 3.23.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 36

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 235Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 7.48%Avg annual filing rate
  • 16.3%Peak (2014)
  • 65Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2012 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 450190004002012: 16 filings (2.04/100 renter HHs)2013: 26 filings (3.31/100 renter HHs)2014: 128 filings (16.28/100 renter HHs)2015: 65 filings (8.27/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 306% over the past 4 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 267Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 13.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.26×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.06× baseline)2020-02-01: 21 filings (1.15× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (0.19× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 3 filings (0.20× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.06× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.07× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.18× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (0.12× baseline)2021-02-01: 13 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-03-01: 4 filings (0.37× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.06× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.18× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (0.30× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 8 filings (0.44× baseline)2022-03-01: 5 filings (0.47× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.06× baseline)2022-05-01: 4 filings (0.24× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (0.20× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.07× baseline)2022-08-01: 6 filings (0.55× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (0.19× baseline)2022-10-01: 5 filings (0.32× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (0.15× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (0.44× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (0.18× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 8 filings (0.74× baseline)2023-04-01: 6 filings (0.39× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.06× baseline)2023-06-01: 11 filings (0.72× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.07× baseline)2023-08-01: 6 filings (0.55× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2023-10-01: 15 filings (0.95× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (0.22× baseline)2023-12-01: 6 filings (0.53× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (0.18× baseline)2024-02-01: 9 filings (0.49× baseline)2024-03-01: 6 filings (0.56× baseline)2024-04-01: 4 filings (0.26× baseline)2024-05-01: 7 filings (0.42× baseline)2024-06-01: 5 filings (0.33× baseline)2024-07-01: 4 filings (0.26× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (0.48× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (0.13× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (0.22× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.06× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 10 filings (0.93× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.06× baseline)2025-06-01: 12 filings (0.79× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (0.07× baseline)2025-08-01: 9 filings (0.82× baseline)2025-09-01: 6 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-10-01: 6 filings (0.38× baseline)2025-11-01: 5 filings (0.37× baseline)2025-12-01: 7 filings (0.62× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Charleston, SC as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in King Street Fashion District

The heaviest input here is economic stress at 9.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Charleston eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Charleston County average of 5.2 and above the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.26x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 36th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 45019000400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45019000400?

Census tract 45019000400 in the King Street Fashion District neighborhood scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45019000400?

Median gross rent is $1,128/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 68% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45019000400?

39.0% of residents in tract 45019000400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,462.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45019000400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 57th, household 1th, minority 46th, housing 74th.
Q5

Is tract 45019000400 considered part of King Street Fashion District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45019000400 fall within King Street Fashion District (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45019000400?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 235 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 45019000400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.48% of renter households, peaking at 16.3% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 45019000400 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.26× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Charleston eviction risk, SC), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 45019000400 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 45019000400 compare to Charleston overall?

Tract 45019000400 scores 5.5/10, higher than the parent city of Charleston at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Charleston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Charleston

Top eight tracts in Charleston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related