Neighborhood · Ranked #26,446 of 84,120 nationally
Forks of Beaverdam Eviction Risk: Moderate , Slater-Marietta
Tract 45045004101 ·
Greenville County, SC · pop 3,637 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
The Forks of Beaverdam area of Slater-Marietta anchors census tract 45045004101, which lands at 4.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 31st percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 11% of renter households, a modest level, and 3% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $761 a month while the average household earns $52,134 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 19% of occupied homes.
Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%Stable renters 17%Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units1,374
Renter share19.0%
SVI overall0.63
Poverty rate19.2%
Median income$52,134
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Forks of Beaverdam
Moderate
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Slater-Marietta
Moderate
Within county
79th percentile
#27 of 123 tracts In Greenville County
High
Within state
75th percentile
#330 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Slater-Marietta and the region
Centroid at 35.0375, -82.5066 · click any tract to drill in
Why Forks of Beaverdam scores 4.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Slater-Marietta
4.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.1
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
19.2% poverty · this tract
4.8
Supply constraint
$761 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Slater-Marietta
4.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Slater-Marietta
4.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Slater-Marietta
6.6
How Forks of Beaverdam compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 63
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
61%Socioeconomic
78%Household composition
11%Racial/ethnic minority
64%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
243Total filings 2020-21
3.5Avg monthly (observed)
4.1Pre-pandemic baseline
0.85×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2025-10-01
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Greenville, SC as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
13.5%Housing insecurity
9.0%Utility-shutoff threat
19.6%Food insecurity
11.7%SNAP enrollment
9.2%Transit barriers
14.5%No health insurance
18.9%Frequent mental distress
36.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Forks of Beaverdam
What moves this score most is housing court bias at 6.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Slater-Marietta, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Greenville County average of 5.6 and below the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 13.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 63rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 45045004101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45045004101?
Census tract 45045004101 in the Forks of Beaverdam neighborhood scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 45045004101?
Median gross rent is $761/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 11% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 45045004101?
19.2% of residents in tract 45045004101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,637.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 45045004101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 63th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 78th, minority 11th, housing 64th.
Q5
Is tract 45045004101 considered part of Forks of Beaverdam?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45045004101 fall within Forks of Beaverdam (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
Did eviction filings in tract 45045004101 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.85× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Greenville eviction risk, SC), 2020-2021.
Q7
What share of households in tract 45045004101 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 45045004101 compare to Slater-Marietta overall?
Tract 45045004101 scores 4.9/10, higher than the parent city of Slater-Marietta at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Slater-Marietta; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.