Hampton County, South Carolina Eviction Risk: Low
10 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Hampton (3.1) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.
Ranked #4 of 46 SC counties
10k residents · 10 cities · 7 tracts
Hampton County eviction risk score history
Key metrics
-
Tenant beats landlord18.5%/ 100 outcomesIn court-decided eviction outcomes for Hampton County, SC, tenants prevail in roughly 18.5% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses and longer calendars.
-
Timeline40dfiling → judgmentFrom the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Hampton County, SC until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 40 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent for landlords.
-
Cost range$1.4–4.0klegal + lost rentA typical eviction in Hampton County, SC costs landlords $1,395 to $4,007 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent.
-
Average rent$80530% stretched on rentAverage gross rent in Hampton County, SC is $805 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey. 30% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent.
-
Renters34.7%of households34.7% of occupied housing units in Hampton County, SC are renter-occupied. A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings and a more active rental market.
-
Poverty19.9%11.2% unemp.19.9% of Hampton County, SC residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 11.2%. Both feed the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model.
Scrub 50 years
Hampton County's 2.9/10 score (Low tier) reflects elevated poverty and above-threshold rent burden across a small rural renter pool. City scores span 2.1 to 3.1/10. Ranked 4th of 46 South Carolina counties - in the higher-risk third statewide, with only 3 counties scoring higher.
How Hampton County ranks in South Carolina
Landlord guides for South Carolina
| City↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | % income on rent↕ | Average rent↕ | Lean↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Hampton | 2,636 | 3.0 | 30.1% | $909 | Dem |
| 002 | Varnville | 2,571 | 3.0 | 37.9% | $800 | Dem |
| 003 | Estill | 1,886 | 3.1 | 34.3% | $745 | Dem |
| 004 | Yemassee | 1,178 | 2.6 | 19.6% | $748 | Dem |
| 005 | Furman | 673 | 2.4 | 9.0% | $575 | Dem |
| 006 | Brunson | 401 | 2.8 | 28.3% | $945 | Dem |
| 007 | Luray | 311 | 2.7 | 33.7% | $832 | Dem |
| 008 | Gifford | 268 | 2.8 | 33.7% | $832 | Dem |
| 009 | Scotia | 97 | 3.0 | 33.7% | $832 | Dem |
| 010 | Islandton | 56 | 2.1 | 33.7% | $832 | Dem |
County heatmap
One county, multiple regulatory regimes.
Hampton County sits in the higher-risk of South Carolina eviction laws's 46 counties for landlord-tenant friction, carrying an eviction risk score of 2.9/10 (Low) and ranking 4th of 46 statewide - meaning only 3 counties present a higher-risk operating environment for landlords. Across the county's 10 municipalities, individual city scores span from 2.1 to 3.1/10, a range that reflects real variation in local poverty exposure, rent burden, and renter density even within this small rural market. With about 10,077 residents and average rents near $805 per month, Hampton County is a thinly traded rental market where a single contested eviction can loom large relative to a landlord's portfolio.
The county seat, the City of Hampton, scores 3/10, while Varnville matches that at 3/10. The riskiest municipality in the county is Estill at 3.1/10 - the only city here that exceeds the county average - driven by a poverty rate that runs well above the county's already elevated 19.9% figure and a renter share concentrated in older housing stock with limited turnover. Scotia also registers at 3/10. At the lower end, Furman scores 2.4/10 and Yemassee scores 2.6/10, the two communities where renter demographics and income levels produce the smallest friction signals. Brunson (2.8/10) and Gifford (2.8/10) sit in the middle of the local range, and Luray comes in at 2.7/10.
Hampton County's 30.4% average rent-burden rate - the share of renter household income going to rent - sits above the standard 30% affordability threshold, which matters operationally because rent-burdened tenants have less buffer against income disruptions. That buffer erosion translates into higher nonpayment risk for landlords, particularly in Estill and Hampton where poverty rates are sharpest. The county's 34.7% renter share is moderate, meaning ownership still dominates, but the renter pool that does exist skews toward lower-income households. South Carolina's statewide average is 2.5/10; Hampton County's position 4th spots from the top puts it notably above that benchmark, a gap landlords should weigh before expanding here versus higher-income coastal or Midlands markets.
Hampton County's 2.9/10 eviction risk score reflects a combination of elevated poverty (19.9%), above-threshold rent burden (30.4%), and a small, economically stressed renter pool concentrated in a handful of towns. Scores across the county range from 2.1 to 3.1/10, with Estill (3.1/10) anchoring the high end and Furman (2.4/10) the low end. The county's 4th-of-46 statewide rank places it in the higher-risk tier despite carrying a Low label - a signal that even nominally low-risk rural counties in economically distressed regions warrant careful per-unit underwriting.
Eviction filings in Hampton County
In September 2025, 6 eviction filings were recorded in Hampton County, 42.9% of the historical average (below average).1
- 6Sep 2025
- 42.9%of historical avg
- 1,874Renter households
- 20.0%Poverty rate
Historical eviction filings in Hampton County
From 2000 to 2015, eviction filings in Hampton County increased 51%. The peak was 173 filings in 2011.2
- 962000
- 173Peak (2011)
- 1452015
Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.
How Hampton County compares
Hampton County's 2.9/10 score is higher than the South Carolina average of 2.5/10, placing it 4th of 46 statewide. Peer rural counties - Marlboro, Chesterfield, Chester, Clarendon, and Bamberg - all land in a qualitatively similar band but below Hampton County's score, reflecting Hampton's higher poverty rate (19.9%) and above-threshold rent burden (30.4%). Within the county, the gap between Estill at 3.1/10 and Furman at 2.4/10 is the widest intra-county spread, and landlords underwriting Estill specifically should treat it as a meaningfully different risk pocket than the county average suggests.