Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #58,384 of 84,120 nationally

Seaglass Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Little River

Tract 45051040103 · Horry County, SC · pop 5,357 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

The Moderate-tier score of 5.8/10 for census tract 45051040103 reflects conditions in the Seaglass Village area of Little River, South Carolina. That is riskier than about 67% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 65% of renter households, a severe level, and 40% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,427 a month while the average household earns $61,541 a year, roughly 28% of income at the averages. About 20% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 7% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units3,101
Renter share19.9%
SVI overall0.55
Poverty rate9.2%
Median income$61,541

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Seaglass Village
Moderate
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Little River
Elevated
Within county
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#59 of 77 tracts In Horry County
Low
Within state
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#965 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Little River and the region

Centroid at 33.8803, -78.6541 · click any tract to drill in

Why Seaglass Village scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Little River
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.3
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
9.2% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$1,427 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Little River
6.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Little River
5.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Little River
5.7

How Seaglass Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Seaglass Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 040103Little River: 2.42.4Little Riverparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 55

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 643Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 16.05%Avg annual filing rate
  • 18.0%Peak (2012)
  • 121Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 450510401032010: 122 filings (16.09/100 renter HHs)2011: 122 filings (15.02/100 renter HHs)2012: 146 filings (17.98/100 renter HHs)2013: 132 filings (16.26/100 renter HHs)2014: 121 filings (14.90/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 5 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Seaglass Village

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 6.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Little River eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Horry County average of 5.3 and in line with the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 643 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 16.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 18.0% of renter households in 2012.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 45051040103

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45051040103?

Census tract 45051040103 in the Seaglass Village neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45051040103?

Median gross rent is $1,427/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45051040103?

9.2% of residents in tract 45051040103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,357.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45051040103?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 55th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 58th, household 58th, minority 28th, housing 50th.
Q5

Is tract 45051040103 considered part of Seaglass Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45051040103 fall within Seaglass Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45051040103?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 643 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 45051040103 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 16.05% of renter households, peaking at 18.0% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45051040103 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45051040103 compare to Little River overall?

Tract 45051040103 scores 3/10, higher than the parent city of Little River at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Little River eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Little River

Top eight tracts in Little River ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related