Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Pleasant Place Eviction Risk: Lower , Lexington

Tract 45063021023 · Lexington County, SC · pop 2,862 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

45063021023 is a census tract in the Pleasant Place area of Lexington County, SC. It scores 3/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,862. Cost burden runs 20% here against 37.2% across Lexington County.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 4% Owners 95%
Tract context
Occupied units1,187
Renter share4.5%
SVI overall0.22
Poverty rate6.8%
Median income$98,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Pleasant Place
Very High
Within county
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#66 of 92 tracts In Lexington County
Low
Within state
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#932 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Low
National
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lexington and the region

Centroid at 33.9674, -81.3125 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pleasant Place scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lexington
2.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.5
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
6.8% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,735 rent vs county FMR
8.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lexington
2.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lexington
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lexington
5.0

How Pleasant Place compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Pleasant Place risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0210233.8Lexingtonparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 22

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 94Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 12.38%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.9%Peak (2013)
  • 20Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 45063021023
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Pleasant Place. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Pleasant Place

The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.6/10. The voucher gap is 33.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Sitting well above the midpoint, supply constraint reads 8.4/10.

Running cool, economic stress reads 1.7/10. SNAP participation runs 4.7% against 15.2% nationally. Against the Lexington County average of 3.9, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.9 points.

Court records carry 94 eviction filings across 5 observed years. Food insecurity runs 9.8% against 17.8% nationally. The worst year on record was 2013, when 12.9% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 12.4% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Only 5% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 45063021023

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45063021023?

Census tract 45063021023 in the Pleasant Place neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45063021023?

Median gross rent is $1,735/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 20% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45063021023?

6.8% of residents in tract 45063021023 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,862.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45063021023?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 22th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 66th, minority 24th, housing 24th.
Q5

Is tract 45063021023 considered part of Pleasant Place?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45063021023 fall within Pleasant Place (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45063021023?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 94 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 45063021023 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 12.38% of renter households, peaking at 12.9% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45063021023 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45063021023 compare to Lexington overall?

Tract 45063021023 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Lexington at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lexington eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related