Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Spring Lake Eviction Risk: Lower , Lexington
Tract 45063021038 ·
Lexington County, SC · pop 4,143 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
With a score of 3/10, tract 45063021038 in the Spring Lake area of Lexington, SC reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,143. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.6/10.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%Stable renters 14%Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,506
Renter share21.8%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate2.5%
Median income$106,944
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Spring Lake
Moderate
Within parent city
50th percentile
#8 of 15 tracts In Lexington
Moderate
Within county
15th percentile
#78 of 92 tracts In Lexington County
Very Low
Within state
29th percentile
#932 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lexington and the region
Centroid at 34.0107, -81.1751 · click any tract to drill in
Why Spring Lake scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lexington
4.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.5
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
2.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,528 rent vs county FMR
6.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lexington
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lexington
7.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lexington
4.8
How Spring Lake compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 39
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
22%Socioeconomic
60%Household composition
54%Racial/ethnic minority
50%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
8.0%Housing insecurity
4.8%Utility-shutoff threat
8.7%Food insecurity
3.7%SNAP enrollment
4.8%Transit barriers
7.4%No health insurance
14.0%Frequent mental distress
18.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Spring Lake
Running cool, economic stress reads 1/10. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.9/10.
Disability prevalence runs 18.8% against 31.5% nationally. SNAP participation runs 3.7% against 15.2% nationally.
The voucher gap is 17.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. It sits 0.9 points below the Lexington County average of 3.9. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
At 22% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.5/10. Against average income of $106,944, annual rent is just 17%.
Statewide the SC average is 4.0, so this tract runs 1.0 points cooler. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 2%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
38% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 45063021038
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45063021038?
Census tract 45063021038 in the Spring Lake neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 45063021038?
Median gross rent is $1,528/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 45063021038?
2.5% of residents in tract 45063021038 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,143.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 45063021038?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 22th, household 60th, minority 54th, housing 50th.
Q5
Is tract 45063021038 considered part of Spring Lake?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45063021038 fall within Spring Lake (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 45063021038 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 45063021038 compare to Lexington overall?
Tract 45063021038 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Lexington at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lexington eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Lexington
Top eight tracts in Lexington ranked by composite eviction-risk score.