Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,336 of 84,120 nationally

Rosewood Eviction Risk: Moderate , Columbia

Tract 45079002605 · Richland County, SC · pop 5,298 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Tract 45079002605 sits in the Rosewood area of Columbia eviction risk, SC, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.2/10. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.8/10.

Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 34% Stable renters 38% Owners 28%
Tract context
Occupied units2,828
Renter share72.9%
SVI overall0.81
Poverty rate23.1%
Median income$41,053

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Rosewood
Moderate
Within parent city
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#16 of 53 tracts In Columbia
Elevated
Within county
79 th percentile
Rank, 79th percentileLowHigh
#21 of 98 tracts In Richland County
High
Within state
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#163 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Columbia and the region

Centroid at 33.9784, -80.9850 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rosewood scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Columbia
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.9
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
23.1% poverty · this tract
5.8
Supply constraint
$1,089 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Columbia
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Columbia
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Columbia
3.0

How Rosewood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rosewood risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.2This tracttract 0026053.8Columbiaparent city4.2Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 81

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rosewood

27% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10. 73% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.1/10. The poverty rate is 23%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Against the Richland County average of 4.2, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.0 points.

At $1,089 a month, rents run 10% under what the rest of Columbia commands. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Columbia. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 65th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.3/10. Statewide the SC average is 4.0, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 45079002605

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45079002605?

Census tract 45079002605 in the Rosewood neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45079002605?

Median gross rent is $1,089/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45079002605?

23.1% of residents in tract 45079002605 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,298.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45079002605?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 81th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 81th, household 61th, minority 68th, housing 77th.
Q5

Is tract 45079002605 considered part of Rosewood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45079002605 fall within Rosewood (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 45079002605 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 45079002605 compare to Columbia overall?

Tract 45079002605 scores 5.2/10, higher than the parent city of Columbia at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Columbia eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 45079002605 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Columbia

Top eight tracts in Columbia ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related