Rosewood Eviction Risk: Moderate , Columbia
Tract 45079002605 · Richland County, SC · pop 5,298 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
Tract 45079002605 sits in the Rosewood area of Columbia eviction risk, SC, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.2/10. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.8/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Columbia and the region
Centroid at 33.9784, -80.9850 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rosewood scores 5.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Rosewood compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 81
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 81%Socioeconomic
- 61%Household composition
- 68%Racial/ethnic minority
- 77%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 18.0%Housing insecurity
- 13.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 21.2%Food insecurity
- 15.6%SNAP enrollment
- 11.9%Transit barriers
- 12.4%No health insurance
- 18.9%Frequent mental distress
- 32.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Rosewood
27% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10. 73% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.
On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.1/10. The poverty rate is 23%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Against the Richland County average of 4.2, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.0 points.
At $1,089 a month, rents run 10% under what the rest of Columbia commands. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Columbia. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 65th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.3/10. Statewide the SC average is 4.0, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 45079002605
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45079002605?
What is the average rent in tract 45079002605?
What is the poverty rate in tract 45079002605?
How socially vulnerable is tract 45079002605?
Is tract 45079002605 considered part of Rosewood?
What share of households in tract 45079002605 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 45079002605 compare to Columbia overall?
Was tract 45079002605 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Columbia
Top eight tracts in Columbia ranked by composite eviction-risk score.