Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally
Cedar Valley Eviction Risk: Lower , Catawba
Tract 45091061203 · York County, SC · pop 6,924 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
For landlords sizing up Cedar Valley in Catawba, census tract 45091061203 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 4.9/10. That is riskier than about 34% of US census tracts.
24% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $960 monthly, set against $73,083 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 14% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%
Stable renters 11%
Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units2,579
Renter share14.3%
SVI overall0.42
Poverty rate6.7%
Median income$73,083
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
52
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
34
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Catawba and the region
Centroid at 34.8511, -80.9340 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cedar Valley scores 3.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Catawba
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.2
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
6.7% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$960 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Catawba
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Catawba
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Catawba
7.0
How Cedar Valley compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 42
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 58%Socioeconomic
- 33%Household composition
- 31%Racial/ethnic minority
- 33%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 78Total filings over 1 yrs
- 21.85%Avg annual filing rate
- 21.9%Peak (2012)
- 78Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.4%Housing insecurity
- 7.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 15.1%Food insecurity
- 8.0%SNAP enrollment
- 7.2%Transit barriers
- 10.2%No health insurance
- 17.0%Frequent mental distress
- 29.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Cedar Valley
The heaviest input here is housing court bias at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Catawba, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the York County average of 5.1 and below the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 11.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 78 eviction filings here over 1 tracked years, with about 21.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 21.9% of renter households in 2012.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 45091061203
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45091061203?
Census tract 45091061203 in the Cedar Valley neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 45091061203?
Median gross rent is $960/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 24% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 45091061203?
6.7% of residents in tract 45091061203 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,924.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 45091061203?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 42th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 58th, household 33th, minority 31th, housing 33th.
Q5
Is tract 45091061203 considered part of Cedar Valley?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45091061203 fall within Cedar Valley (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45091061203?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 78 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 45091061203 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 21.85% of renter households, peaking at 21.9% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 45091061203 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 45091061203 compare to Catawba overall?
Tract 45091061203 scores 3.3/10, higher than the parent city of Catawba at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Catawba; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Catawba
Top eight tracts in Catawba ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related