Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally

Saks Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 01015001700 · Calhoun County, AL · pop 6,135 · 90% of tract blocks fall in Saks

Eviction risk in Saks centers on tract 01015001700, which scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 6,135 residents. It lands near the 19th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

31% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $939 a month while the average household earns $64,159 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 26% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 18% Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units2,285
Renter share26.3%
SVI overall0.64
Poverty rate12.4%
Median income$64,159

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Saks
Very Low
Within county
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#27 of 38 tracts In Calhoun County
Low
Within state
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#807 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Moderate
National
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#42,763 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Saks and the region

Centroid at 33.7278, -85.8444 · click any tract to drill in

Why Saks scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Saks
3.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.1
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
12.4% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$939 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Saks
3.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Saks
5.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Saks
5.0

How Saks compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Saks risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.93.9This tracttract 001700Saks: 2.32.3Saksparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.14.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 64

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 330Total filings over 14 yrs
  • 5.07%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.0%Peak (2014)
  • 25Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 010150017002001: 17 filings (3.24/100 renter HHs)2002: 28 filings (5.34/100 renter HHs)2003: 21 filings (4.01/100 renter HHs)2006: 21 filings (4.09/100 renter HHs)2007: 27 filings (5.25/100 renter HHs)2008: 20 filings (3.89/100 renter HHs)2009: 21 filings (4.09/100 renter HHs)2010: 22 filings (4.36/100 renter HHs)2011: 25 filings (6.05/100 renter HHs)2012: 25 filings (6.05/100 renter HHs)2013: 23 filings (5.57/100 renter HHs)2014: 33 filings (7.99/100 renter HHs)2015: 22 filings (5.33/100 renter HHs)2016: 25 filings (5.73/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 47% over the past 14 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Saks

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 5.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Saks, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Calhoun County average of 4.7 and in line with the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 330 eviction filings here over 14 tracked years, with about 5.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 8.0% of renter households in 2014.

In CDC survey modeling, about 12.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 01015001700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01015001700?

Census tract 01015001700 in Saks scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01015001700?

Median gross rent is $939/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01015001700?

12.4% of residents in tract 01015001700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,135.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01015001700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 65th, household 64th, minority 67th, housing 46th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01015001700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 330 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 01015001700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.07% of renter households, peaking at 8.0% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 01015001700 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 01015001700 compare to Saks overall?

Tract 01015001700 scores 3.9/10, higher than the parent city of Saks at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Saks; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Saks

Top eight tracts in Saks ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related