Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #52,479 of 84,120 nationally
Langston Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 01071951102 · Jackson County, AL · pop 2,401 · 15% of tract blocks fall in Langston
Census tract 01071951102 covers part of Langston, AL, and scores 3.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,401 residents. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 9.6/10.
Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%
Stable renters 14%
Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,031
Renter share21.4%
SVI overall0.58
Poverty rate12.8%
Median income$47,961
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
60
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
53
th percentile
Moderate
National
38
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Langston and the region
Centroid at 34.5292, -86.0299 · click any tract to drill in
Why Langston scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Langston
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
1.6
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
12.8% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$732 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Langston
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Langston
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Langston
9.2
How Langston compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 58
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 86%Socioeconomic
- 44%Household composition
- 10%Racial/ethnic minority
- 32%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.3%Housing insecurity
- 8.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 18.9%Food insecurity
- 14.3%SNAP enrollment
- 9.4%Transit barriers
- 10.2%No health insurance
- 18.4%Frequent mental distress
- 43.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Langston
On the high side, housing-court posture reads 9.2/10. On the softer side, regional political climate reads 1.6/10.
Disability prevalence runs 43.7% against 31.5% nationally. Severe burden reaches 12%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the national scale it lands near the 38th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
At 21% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 6.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. 33% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.
It tracks the Jackson County average of 3.9 closely. Average gross rent is $732, close to the Langston average.
Annual rent works out to 18% of average household income of $47,961.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 01071951102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01071951102?
Census tract 01071951102 in Langston scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01071951102?
Median gross rent is $732/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01071951102?
12.8% of residents in tract 01071951102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,401.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01071951102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 58th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 86th, household 44th, minority 10th, housing 32th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 01071951102 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 01071951102 compare to Langston overall?
Tract 01071951102 scores 3.8/10, lower than the parent city of Langston at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Langston; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related