Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Longmeadow Eviction Risk: Lower , Trussville

Tract 01073011109 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 5,085 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Census tract 01073011109 covers part of the Longmeadow area of Trussville, AL, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. 28% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Jefferson County average of 46.3%.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 11% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units1,878
Renter share15.5%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate2.2%
Median income$135,887

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Longmeadow
Very High
Within parent city
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 6 tracts In Trussville
Low
Within county
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#161 of 189 tracts In Jefferson County
Very Low
Within state
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#968 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Trussville and the region

Centroid at 33.6475, -86.5817 · click any tract to drill in

Why Longmeadow scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Trussville
2.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
2.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,620 rent vs county FMR
7.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Trussville
4.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Trussville
2.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Trussville
3.5

How Longmeadow compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Longmeadow risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0111093.2Trussvilleparent city4.3Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 1

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 90Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 2.69%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.4%Peak (2006)
  • 2Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 01073011109
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Longmeadow. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Longmeadow

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. Severe burden reaches 23%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.3/10. The voucher gap is 27.9%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.8/10. It sits 1.3 points below the Jefferson County average of 4.3.

Food insecurity runs 7.3% against 17.8% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 90 filings here across 11 tracked years. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 4.1% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

The worst year on record was 2006, when 8.4% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 2.7% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Only 16% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 1.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 01073011109

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073011109?

Census tract 01073011109 in the Longmeadow neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01073011109?

Median gross rent is $1,620/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01073011109?

2.2% of residents in tract 01073011109 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,085.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01073011109?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 1th, household 2th, minority 9th, housing 26th.
Q5

Is tract 01073011109 considered part of Longmeadow?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073011109 fall within Longmeadow (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073011109?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 90 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 01073011109 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.69% of renter households, peaking at 8.4% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 01073011109 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 01073011109 compare to Trussville overall?

Tract 01073011109 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Trussville at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Trussville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Trussville

Top eight tracts in Trussville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related