Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #49,882 of 84,120 nationally

Jefferson Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Irondale

Tract 01073012701 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 4,287 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

With a score of 4.6/10, tract 01073012701 in the Jefferson Park area of Irondale ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 4,287 residents. It lands near the 27th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

16% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $911 a month against an average household income of $82,370 a year, roughly 13% of income at the averages. Renters make up 25% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 21% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units1,846
Renter share25.5%
SVI overall0.38
Poverty rate10.1%
Median income$82,370

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Jefferson Park
Moderate
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 5 tracts In Irondale
High
Within county
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#114 of 189 tracts In Jefferson County
Low
Within state
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#942 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Irondale and the region

Centroid at 33.5446, -86.6466 · click any tract to drill in

Why Jefferson Park scores 3.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Irondale
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
10.1% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$911 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Irondale
6.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Irondale
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Irondale
6.3

How Jefferson Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Jefferson Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.53.5This tracttract 012701Irondale: 2.72.7Irondaleparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.14.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 38

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 59Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 2.32%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.7%Peak (2012)
  • 5Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 010730127012000: 7 filings (3.42/100 renter HHs)2001: 8 filings (3.91/100 renter HHs)2002: 6 filings (2.93/100 renter HHs)2003: 6 filings (2.93/100 renter HHs)2005: 8 filings (2.35/100 renter HHs)2006: 5 filings (1.47/100 renter HHs)2012: 9 filings (2.65/100 renter HHs)2013: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2014: 1 filings (0.29/100 renter HHs)2015: 4 filings (1.18/100 renter HHs)2016: 5 filings (2.02/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 29% over the past 11 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Jefferson Park

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Irondale eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Jefferson County average of 5.3 and in line with the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 2% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 59 eviction filings here over 10 tracked years, with about 2.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 2.7% of renter households in 2012.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 01073012701

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073012701?

Census tract 01073012701 in the Jefferson Park neighborhood scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01073012701?

Median gross rent is $911/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 16% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01073012701?

10.1% of residents in tract 01073012701 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,287.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01073012701?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 38th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 30th, household 14th, minority 55th, housing 71th.
Q5

Is tract 01073012701 considered part of Jefferson Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073012701 fall within Jefferson Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073012701?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 59 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 01073012701 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.32% of renter households, peaking at 2.7% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 01073012701 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 01073012701 compare to Irondale overall?

Tract 01073012701 scores 3.5/10, higher than the parent city of Irondale at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Irondale eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 01073012701 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 2% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Irondale

Top eight tracts in Irondale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related