Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Chace Lake Eviction Risk: Lower , Hoover
Tract 01073014408 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 4,110 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
Tract 01073014408 sits in the Chace Lake area of Hoover eviction risk, AL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. Population here is 4,110. Cost burden runs 61% here against 46.3% across Jefferson County.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 53%
Stable renters 34%
Owners 13%
Tract context
Occupied units1,923
Renter share86.8%
SVI overall0.74
Poverty rate6.7%
Median income$48,564
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
82
th percentile
High
Within county
29
th percentile
Low
Within state
33
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Hoover and the region
Centroid at 33.3721, -86.8108 · click any tract to drill in
Why Chace Lake scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Hoover
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
6.7% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,383 rent vs county FMR
5.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hoover
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hoover
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hoover
2.0
How Chace Lake compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 74
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 57%Socioeconomic
- 56%Household composition
- 70%Racial/ethnic minority
- 89%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 640Total filings over 11 yrs
- 6.63%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.7%Peak (2014)
- 92Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 171% over the past 11 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.7%Housing insecurity
- 9.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 18.0%Food insecurity
- 12.0%SNAP enrollment
- 9.4%Transit barriers
- 8.8%No health insurance
- 16.3%Frequent mental distress
- 32.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Chace Lake
Severe burden reaches 30%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. This is renter territory: 87% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.
Set annual rent against average income of $48,564 and the ratio lands at 34%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Running cool, tenant-organizing strength reads 1.5/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.7/10.
It sits 1.3 points below the Jefferson County average of 4.3. The filing record is not thin: 640 evictions over 11 years of observation.
Filings peaked in 2014 at 5.7% of renter households. In a typical year about 6.6% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.7/10.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 01073014408
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073014408?
Census tract 01073014408 in the Chace Lake neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01073014408?
Median gross rent is $1,383/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01073014408?
6.7% of residents in tract 01073014408 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,110.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01073014408?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 74th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 57th, household 56th, minority 70th, housing 89th.
Q5
Is tract 01073014408 considered part of Chace Lake?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073014408 fall within Chace Lake (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073014408?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 640 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 01073014408 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.63% of renter households, peaking at 5.7% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 01073014408 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 01073014408 compare to Hoover overall?
Tract 01073014408 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Hoover at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hoover eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Hoover
Top eight tracts in Hoover ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · AL
Huntington Park
4.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
Inverness Cliffs
3.7
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AL
Chapel Hill
3.5
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AL
Riverchase
3.3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AL
01073014208
3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AL
01117030352
3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AL
Pineland Park
3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AL
Chimney Hills
3
/ 10 · Low
Related