Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #82,639 of 84,120 nationally

Wine Ridge Eviction Risk: Lower , Hoover

Tract 01117030304 · Shelby County, AL · pop 6,520 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

The Wine Ridge neighborhood of Hoover anchors census tract 01117030304, which lands at 2.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #82,964 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 0% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,288 monthly, set against $140,125 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 1% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 1% Owners 99%
Tract context
Occupied units2,307
Renter share1.2%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate3.9%
Median income$140,125

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Wine Ridge
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#23 of 23 tracts In Hoover
Very Low
Within county
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#55 of 55 tracts In Shelby County
Very Low
Within state
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#1,432 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Hoover and the region

Centroid at 33.3868, -86.7579 · click any tract to drill in

Why Wine Ridge scores 1.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Hoover
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.0
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
3.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,288 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hoover
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hoover
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hoover
2.0

How Wine Ridge compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Wine Ridge risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.11.1This tracttract 030304Hoover: 2.22.2Hooverparent cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.14.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 3

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 19Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 7.26%Avg annual filing rate
  • 16.7%Peak (2001)
  • 3Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 011170303042001: 6 filings (16.67/100 renter HHs)2002: 2 filings (5.56/100 renter HHs)2006: 2 filings (3.03/100 renter HHs)2012: 4 filings (15.38/100 renter HHs)2013: 1 filings (3.85/100 renter HHs)2014: 1 filings (3.85/100 renter HHs)2016: 3 filings (2.50/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 50% over the past 7 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Wine Ridge

What moves this score most is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hoover eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Shelby County average of 4.3 and below the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 3rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 01117030304

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01117030304?

Census tract 01117030304 in the Wine Ridge neighborhood scores 1.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01117030304?

Median gross rent is $2,288/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 0% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01117030304?

3.9% of residents in tract 01117030304 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,520.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01117030304?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 12th, minority 26th, housing 12th.
Q5

Is tract 01117030304 considered part of Wine Ridge?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01117030304 fall within Wine Ridge (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01117030304?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 19 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 01117030304 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.26% of renter households, peaking at 16.7% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 01117030304 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 01117030304 compare to Hoover overall?

Tract 01117030304 scores 1.1/10, lower than the parent city of Hoover at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hoover eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Hoover

Top eight tracts in Hoover ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related