Census Tract · Ranked #56,048 of 84,120 nationally
Meadview Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 04015950403 ·
Mohave, AZ · pop 1,822 · 47% of tract blocks fall in Meadview
Census tract 04015950403 covers part of Meadview, AZ, and scores 3.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,822. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1.3/10.
Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%Stable renters 5%Owners 95%
Tract context
Occupied units953
Renter share5.1%
SVI overall0.45
Poverty rate18.5%
Median income$55,170
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Meadview
Moderate
Within county
55th percentile
#30 of 66 tracts In Mohave
Elevated
Within state
54th percentile
#811 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Moderate
National
33th percentile
#56,048 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Meadview and the region
Centroid at 35.8541, -114.4400 · click any tract to drill in
Why Meadview scores 3.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Meadview
3.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.4
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
18.5% poverty · this tract
4.6
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Meadview
1.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Meadview
2.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Meadview
2.2
How Meadview compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 45
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
8.9%Housing insecurity
6.4%Utility-shutoff threat
14.2%Food insecurity
11.8%SNAP enrollment
7.3%Transit barriers
9.7%No health insurance
13.6%Frequent mental distress
41.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Meadview
Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.9/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.2/10.
The poverty rate is 19%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Nationally it ranks #56,048 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 5% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
Social vulnerability reads 5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. It tracks the Mohave County average of 3.7 closely.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 04015950403
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04015950403?
Census tract 04015950403 in Meadview scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 04015950403?
18.5% of residents in tract 04015950403 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,822.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 04015950403?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 45th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 71th, household 42th, minority 4th, housing 28th.
Q4
What share of households in tract 04015950403 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q5
How does tract 04015950403 compare to Meadview overall?
Tract 04015950403 scores 3.6/10, right in line with the parent city of Meadview at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Meadview; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.