Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #11,930 of 84,120 nationally

Landmark Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 05119004006 · Pulaski County, AR · pop 3,418 · 22% of tract blocks fall in Landmark

For landlords sizing up Landmark, census tract 05119004006 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 5.9/10. On the national scale it ranks #22,489 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 56% of renter households, a severe level, and 34% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $736 monthly, set against $34,619 in average yearly household income, roughly 26% of income at the averages. Renters make up 35% of occupied homes.

Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20% Stable renters 15% Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units1,209
Renter share35.0%
SVI overall0.87
Poverty rate24.8%
Median income$34,619

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Landmark
Very High
Within county
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#22 of 107 tracts In Pulaski County
High
Within state
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#136 of 823 tracts In Arkansas
High
National
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#11,930 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Landmark and the region

Centroid at 34.6347, -92.3105 · click any tract to drill in

Why Landmark scores 6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Landmark
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Arkansas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
24.8% poverty · this tract
6.2
Supply constraint
$736 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Landmark
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Landmark
4.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Landmark
9.6

How Landmark compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Landmark risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.06.0This tracttract 004006Landmark: 2.52.5Landmarkparent cityCounty: 4.84.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 87

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Landmark

What moves this score most is housing court bias at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Landmark, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Pulaski County average of 4.5 and above the Arkansas statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 20.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 16.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 87th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 05119004006

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 05119004006?

Census tract 05119004006 in Landmark scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 05119004006?

Median gross rent is $736/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 05119004006?

24.8% of residents in tract 05119004006 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,418.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 05119004006?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 87th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 77th, household 95th, minority 51th, housing 78th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 05119004006 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 05119004006 compare to Landmark overall?

Tract 05119004006 scores 6/10, higher than the parent city of Landmark at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Landmark; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Landmark

Top eight tracts in Landmark ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related