Census Tract · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally
Biggs Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 06007003600 ·
Butte, CA · pop 4,286 · 29% of tract blocks fall in Biggs
Census tract 06007003600 covers part of Biggs, CA, and scores 5/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,286. 38% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Butte County average of 49.5%.
Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9%Stable renters 14%Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units1,256
Renter share22.9%
SVI overall0.65
Poverty rate7.0%
Median income$82,500
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Biggs
Moderate
Within county
11th percentile
#48 of 54 tracts In Butte
Very Low
Within state
5th percentile
#8,675 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
National
61th percentile
#32,842 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Biggs and the region
Centroid at 39.4541, -121.7724 · click any tract to drill in
Why Biggs scores 5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Biggs
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.0% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,378 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Biggs
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Biggs
6.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Biggs
5.3
How Biggs compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 65
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
61%Socioeconomic
91%Household composition
52%Racial/ethnic minority
34%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
13.0%Housing insecurity
6.6%Utility-shutoff threat
14.7%Food insecurity
13.3%SNAP enrollment
8.1%Transit barriers
9.3%No health insurance
18.0%Frequent mental distress
31.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Biggs
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.8/10. Against the Butte County average of 6.6, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.6 points.
The filing record is not thin: 8 evictions over 1 years of observation. 8% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
The worst year on record was 2014, when 1.8% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 1.8% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #32,842 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Only 23% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.8/10.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.5 points cooler. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
Average gross rent is $1,378, close to the Biggs average. Annual rent works out to 20% of average household income of $82,500.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06007003600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06007003600?
Census tract 06007003600 in Biggs scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06007003600?
Median gross rent is $1,378/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06007003600?
7.0% of residents in tract 06007003600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,286.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06007003600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 65th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 91th, minority 52th, housing 34th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 06007003600?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 8 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 06007003600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.81% of renter households, peaking at 1.8% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 06007003600 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06007003600 compare to Biggs overall?
Tract 06007003600 scores 5/10, lower than the parent city of Biggs at 6.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Biggs; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.