Tract 06029003305 ·
Kern, CA · pop 3,448 · 77% of tract blocks fall in Frazier Park
Census tract 06029003305 covers part of Frazier Park, CA, and scores 8/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,448. 32% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17%Stable renters 19%Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units1,492
Renter share36.1%
SVI overall0.78
Poverty rate26.7%
Median income$40,949
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Frazier Park
Moderate
Within county
85th percentile
#36 of 236 tracts In Kern
High
Within state
61th percentile
#3,534 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
National
91th percentile
#7,836 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Frazier Park and the region
Centroid at 34.8025, -118.9628 · click any tract to drill in
Why Frazier Park scores 8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Frazier Park
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
26.7% poverty · this tract
6.7
Supply constraint
$1,293 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Frazier Park
9.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Frazier Park
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Frazier Park
9.2
How Frazier Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 78
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
16.6%Housing insecurity
10.6%Utility-shutoff threat
21.8%Food insecurity
25.3%SNAP enrollment
11.7%Transit barriers
10.4%No health insurance
20.3%Frequent mental distress
39.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Frazier Park
The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 9.2/10. Running hot, housing-court posture reads 9.2/10.
Annualized rent equals 38% of average household income of $40,949, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. It sits 1.6 points above the Kern County average of 6.4.
The poverty rate is 27%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. SNAP participation runs 25.3% against 15.2% nationally.
Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.3/10. At $1,293 a month, rents run 14% under what the rest of Frazier Park commands. Nationally it ranks #7,836 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Social vulnerability reads 8.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
48% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. 36% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06029003305
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06029003305?
Census tract 06029003305 in Frazier Park scores 8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06029003305?
Median gross rent is $1,293/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06029003305?
26.7% of residents in tract 06029003305 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,448.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06029003305?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 78th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 83th, minority 33th, housing 47th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06029003305 struggle to pay rent?
About 16.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06029003305 compare to Frazier Park overall?
Tract 06029003305 scores 8/10, higher than the parent city of Frazier Park at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Frazier Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.