Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #8,912 of 84,120 nationally
Nice Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06033000502 · Lake, CA · pop 2,271 · 77% of tract blocks fall in Nice
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 06033000502 (Nice in Lake County, California) comes in at 6.4/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than roughly 86% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
49% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,328 a month against an average household income of $68,688 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. Renters make up 43% of occupied homes.
Risk score
6.3
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21%
Stable renters 22%
Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units1,133
Renter share43.2%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate12.7%
Median income$68,688
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
40
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
65
th percentile
Elevated
National
89
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Nice and the region
Centroid at 39.1209, -122.8631 · click any tract to drill in
Why Nice scores 6.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Nice
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.7% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$1,328 rent vs county FMR
4.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Nice
6.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Nice
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Nice
6.2
How Nice compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 71
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 45%Socioeconomic
- 74%Household composition
- 54%Racial/ethnic minority
- 89%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 48Total filings over 3 yrs
- 2.82%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.4%Peak (2014)
- 19Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 14.4%Housing insecurity
- 8.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 18.7%Food insecurity
- 19.4%SNAP enrollment
- 10.2%Transit barriers
- 9.4%No health insurance
- 18.8%Frequent mental distress
- 38.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Nice
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Nice, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Lake County average of 6.4 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 14.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 71st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 06033000502
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06033000502?
Census tract 06033000502 in Nice scores 6.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06033000502?
Median gross rent is $1,328/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06033000502?
12.7% of residents in tract 06033000502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,271.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06033000502?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 45th, household 74th, minority 54th, housing 89th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 06033000502?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 48 eviction filings across 3 validated years in tract 06033000502 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.82% of renter households, peaking at 3.4% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 06033000502 struggle to pay rent?
About 14.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06033000502 compare to Nice overall?
Tract 06033000502 scores 6.3/10, lower than the parent city of Nice at 8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Nice; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related