Tract 06033001101 Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06033001101 · Lake, CA · pop 2,168
Lake anchors census tract 06033001101, which lands at 6.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 84th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
54% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,406 a month while the average household earns $65,811 a year, roughly 26% of income at the averages. About 13% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Lake and the region
Centroid at 38.8822, -122.7792 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 06033001101 scores 6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Tract 06033001101 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 58
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 57%Socioeconomic
- 51%Household composition
- 13%Racial/ethnic minority
- 75%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.9%Housing insecurity
- 6.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.9%Food insecurity
- 15.4%SNAP enrollment
- 8.0%Transit barriers
- 6.4%No health insurance
- 17.1%Frequent mental distress
- 35.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Tract 06033001101
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 6.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are set by California eviction laws law, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Lake County average of 6.4 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 10.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 58th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.